Skip to content

Council Meeting Of February 2, 2016


  1. The Truth wrote:

    Flash back of MSNBC , what an idiot. Be afraid be very afraid

    Wednesday, February 3, 2016 at 6:40 am | Permalink
  2. Anonymous wrote:

    The only thing different at about 6:59pm is that the glib one didn’t start his um, huh, and I did or didn’t hear what I heard or didn’t hear Costabile/Zimmer and or Zimmer/Costabile say, didn’t say, did say, flub on and on, during his televised MSNBC interview.

    Any AND all, pertaining to? Do we need aClinton to guide Belmar in knowing what depends on the definition of “Is, Is? Hopefully George isn’t getting paid to counsel OPRA requests now. Try interrogator questions at the library to OPRA the transparent anything in Belmar in future. Obfuscation is just that plain obfuscation. Monmouth County will give you any public information to help the public.

    Wednesday, February 3, 2016 at 8:47 am | Permalink
  3. the voice wrote:

    Don’t be reluctant to come up to the mike and speak, however, these are the rules for how to behave. Anyway, “talk to the hand”, for you common folk not count.

    How about coming down to our level, denizens of the dais?

    Wednesday, February 3, 2016 at 9:57 am | Permalink
  4. Planet Belmar wrote:

    Get’s some integrity, practice what you preach and don’t lecture me, I,m old enough to be your father.

    Wednesday, February 3, 2016 at 10:27 am | Permalink
  5. legion wrote:

    At least the new attorney advised the mayor to recuse himself from voting on the pay-to-play ordinance, although the mayor did not agree, of course. But then the four council members voted “yes” on it anyway. Nice show.

    Wednesday, February 3, 2016 at 10:48 am | Permalink
  6. Pootsie wrote:

    What is the status on the Belmar/Lake Como police merger? When is that bomb being dropped on us. Has anyone asked the residents of our town if this is what we want? Maybe our administration can do a survey. Has anyone explained to us as taxpayers and residents how we get any benefits from the merger?

    Wednesday, February 3, 2016 at 12:48 pm | Permalink
  7. admin wrote:

    Anyone know if it came up at last night’s Lake Como Borough Council meeting?

    Wednesday, February 3, 2016 at 1:04 pm | Permalink
  8. ALLTRUMPEDUP wrote:

    No explanations, no input. Matt’s hoping this issue will fly under the radar. Good luck asking for an Officer when you are in need this coming summer, unless you live next to PK’s in Lake Como. Belmar residents
    wake up, and don’t say I didn’t warn you. A political feather in Matt’s hat when he stumps for Freeholder sacrificing the safety and security of Belmar to bail out the mismanaged Lake Como.

    Wednesday, February 3, 2016 at 1:10 pm | Permalink
  9. Anonymous wrote:

    Wit’s trails and tales will reveal a fat file CYA. The council person who oversees the BPD police knows it all.

    Wednesday, February 3, 2016 at 5:17 pm | Permalink
  10. Eugene Creamer wrote:

    2nd public meeting where Mayor Doherty told residents that attorney McGill works for the Mayor & Council …. not residents.

    If you want good counsel? …. I strongly recommend the 7th Avenue attorneys.

    Thursday, February 4, 2016 at 7:20 am | Permalink
  11. Anonymous wrote:

    George McGill and the counsel, etc work for the taxpayers of Belmar as PUBLIC SERVANTS.

    Thursday, February 4, 2016 at 8:35 am | Permalink
  12. Anonymous wrote:

    Coast Star published the Lake Como police dilemma. NEWARK just made deal with NJ State Trooper services in certain neighborhoods. Interesting. Our summer streets don’t deserve the same protection that is afforded to Newark residents?

    Thursday, February 4, 2016 at 9:48 am | Permalink
  13. Anonymous wrote:

    Shillelagh deal done between MD & BW? Local PBA on board? Discrimination suit going away… NOT

    Thursday, February 4, 2016 at 12:35 pm | Permalink
  14. Public Comment wrote:

    Did anyone catch a non-resident ready to question on behalf of police union being forced to wait to address the mayor Contrast that with the guy union guy from Tom’s River who came to speak for the the proposed ordinance for unions in construction bids. He got called on right away.

    Thursday, February 4, 2016 at 1:55 pm | Permalink
  15. legion wrote:

    #14 I attended both meetings and witnessed the favoritism you mentioned.

    The two men who spoke at the meeting Tuesday night about police matters made excellent points. I especially like that the first fellow used the “c” word – collusion.

    The second person came close to the forbidden “cross examination” and it looked like the mayor got more and more tense, grilled on the spot. He doesn’t like that.

    Thursday, February 4, 2016 at 3:53 pm | Permalink

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.