Common Sense For New Hampshire

20 Comments

1. Cathi wrote:

   No conflict here. Keep moving, nothing to see here…….

   Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 6:58 am | Permalink
2. Cathi wrote:

   What am I missing? Dates of checks are shown as 8/11, 8/13 and 8/15. All have same check #1011 as the check number?? Each $2700 totaling $8100 all have same check #?

   Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 7:26 am | Permalink
3. Resident wrote:

   Shameful but business as usual in Belmar. What a crock, Dave you are a master haul these crooks out of town.

   Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 7:50 am | Permalink
4. What A Scam wrote:

   Give Donation and add to the price of the contract. Make friends and make money!

   Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 7:51 am | Permalink
5. Anonymous wrote:

   Consultant definitions:

   1. One who is unemployed and has trouble getting a job.

   2. Someone who steals your watch and tells you what time it is.

   Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 9:12 am | Permalink
6. Guest wrote:

   Connect the dots for me. Does this affiliation violate an ethics law?

   Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 9:21 am | Permalink
7. admin wrote:

   No idea. Just found it interesting, even if it’s legal.

   Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 9:23 am | Permalink
8. "I will go through U wrote:

   I have gained even more insight by reviewing the Mayor and Council Meetins of last May and June. I highly recommend
   viewing Mayor’s threats to resident Joy DeSanctis- May 6, 2014- Public Comment at 2hr.03 minutes into meeting. Then there is the entire June 17th. Meeting.
   All available on this blog by clicking on council meeting menu-upper right.

   Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 10:22 am | Permalink
9. admin wrote:

   #2 – It’s also worth noting that this filing wasn’t made until January 2015.

   Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 11:37 am | Permalink
10. dizzy wrote:

    Duh, follow the money…
    Wouldn’t it be a hoot if Mrs. DeSanctis runs for council as an independent candidate, and WINS! The mayor’s worst nightmare. Sweet dreams, Matt.

    Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 12:51 pm | Permalink
11. GUEST wrote:

    It’s all legal!

    Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 1:11 pm | Permalink
12. Cathi wrote:

    What is the purpose of listing three separate $2700 items on three separate dates, if all came from the same check #1011.

    Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 2:21 pm | Permalink
13. admin wrote:

    And why was the report submitted months past the filing deadline?

    Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 2:24 pm | Permalink
14. Guest wrote:

    Please everyone chill. Go to facebook: Charlie Cavallo and print out free drink coupon for D’Jais. Good from May 1st to May 17th.

    Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 2:43 pm | Permalink
15. Anonymous wrote:

    From the NJ Election Law Enforcement Commission website:

    Independent expenditures are also subject to 48-hour expenditure notices. If an individual, corporation,
    association, society, firm, company, or partnership makes an independent expenditure in an amount in
    excess of $1,400 from the 13th day prior to an election up through election day, a report or written notice
    must be filed with the Commission within 48 hours of the making, authorizing, or incurring of the
    independent expenditure. The notice shall include the following:
    1. The name and mailing address of the individual, corporation, association, society, firm, company, or
    partnership making the independent expenditure;
    2. For individuals, the occupation of the individual and the name and mailing address of the individual’s
    employer; and,
    3. An itemization of the expenditures, including the dates the expenditures were made, the names and
    addresses of the payees, the amount of each expenditure, and the total amount expended.

    Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 6:44 pm | Permalink
16. Judy wrote:

    I’m so glad that you find these facts to open our eyes to what is happening in town. I agree Joy should run she always has the facts to back up what she has to say.

    Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 11:31 pm | Permalink
17. Anonymous wrote:

    Judy, the problem is there were over 1000 votes for the Democrats, they don’t care what is ethical or financially responsible government, how can she have a chance?????

    Friday, May 1, 2015 at 9:16 am | Permalink
18. dizzy wrote:

    #17 Mrs. DeSanctis is still a registered Democrat as far as I know. Those who don’t know her and blindly vote Democrat will vote her in, even with any smear campaigns launched against her.

    Friday, May 1, 2015 at 10:07 am | Permalink
19. dizzy wrote:

    Add that it does not matter if she switches party. Party loyalties run deep.

    Friday, May 1, 2015 at 10:11 am | Permalink
20. sweetiepieface wrote:

    SHEEPpEOPLE are SHEEPpEOPLE. One simply cannot deny historical records. Better to be the puppet master any Day.

    Friday, May 1, 2015 at 1:36 pm | Permalink

Post a Comment