19 Comments

1. Anonymous wrote:

   I’d like to see the restrictions that are on the D’Jais license.

   Friday, July 7, 2017 at 9:55 pm | Permalink
2. Anonymous wrote:

   So, the Loko/KAPALKO settlement (with our tax paid insurance premium increases +) will be, essentially, in camera?

   Friday, July 7, 2017 at 11:28 pm | Permalink
3. Anonymous wrote:

   $450. per hour law firm purchased how many tickets to “Mayors pay to play” ball?

   Friday, July 7, 2017 at 11:32 pm | Permalink
4. Eugene Creamer wrote:

   the settlement introduces a Belmar “Parking License”

   Saturday, July 8, 2017 at 12:00 am | Permalink
5. Anonymous wrote:

   Council (including Walsifer) are just a bunch of rubber stamp phonies. Nut up to the Mayor, ask questions, you bunch of sheep.

   Saturday, July 8, 2017 at 12:46 am | Permalink
6. OLD MAN wrote:

   Confucius says ask questions you may get the truth

   Saturday, July 8, 2017 at 6:38 am | Permalink
7. Tom Dilberger wrote:

   #5 – I’d hold my fire about Mr. Walsifer. There has been no real opportunity to take on the mayor, bookends and nice lady. If Mr. Walsifer sits there mute the next time Matt goes off the deep end (which he will), that will be the time to condemn him.

   Saturday, July 8, 2017 at 7:12 am | Permalink
8. Guest#2 wrote:

   Frivolous

   Saturday, July 8, 2017 at 7:31 am | Permalink
9. Anonymous wrote:

   The 1st bullet talks about the attached settlement agreement in exhibit A. Did they not include that (and should it be?)

   Also why is the Talyor tenent backing out / being released?

   Saturday, July 8, 2017 at 7:37 am | Permalink
10. admin wrote:

    It should have been attached but anyway I OPRAed it.

    Saturday, July 8, 2017 at 7:40 am | Permalink
11. Guest wrote:

    #1 – Whether in the resolution or not, D’Jais stopped their expansive, and REQUIRED, morning clean-up patrol years ago (probably 7) and were replace by borough employees. The problem this year is that the borough employees seem to have disappeared and the south end streets and sidewalks are a disgusting mess of fast-food junk and beer cans. The place looks like a slum.

    Saturday, July 8, 2017 at 8:28 am | Permalink
12. Guest wrote:

    This is another example of the man-boy mayor having to give in on another of his attempts at being the ruler of Belmar. Good try mayor and thanks for the legal bills left in the wake of your childish acts. Will the new councilman publicically disclose the amount of the unnecessary expenses and condem the mayor and council for their past behavior and for screwing this business?

    Saturday, July 8, 2017 at 8:35 am | Permalink
13. Guest wrote:

    Can it even exist #10? Doesn’t the council need to meet in Executive Session to discuss and approve?

    Saturday, July 8, 2017 at 8:37 am | Permalink
14. Guest wrote:

    11, a few years back, when questioned about why restrictions were removed from D’Jais license, the police chief stated “because (D’Jais) asked for them to be removed.” A photo of the faces in the audience would have been priceless and the truth that D’Jais owns the mayor and council was confirmed.

    Saturday, July 8, 2017 at 8:41 am | Permalink
15. SEASHELL wrote:

    All of this could have been avoided if the town followed through with the original terms of the redevelopers agreement. The people of Belmar should hold them accountable and vote them out! They have wasted valuable tax dollars on exorbitant legal fees. This is not over. The town still has to deal with the Harmon lawsuit. It is quite obvious to everyone that the mayor dislikes the Harmon’s and is doing everything he can to sabotage their business. I hope they have their day in court. Unfortunately, its going to be at the expense of the Belmar taxpayers.

    Saturday, July 8, 2017 at 9:22 am | Permalink
16. A Voter 2 wrote:

    Any word on the Harmon Brothers suit?

    Saturday, July 8, 2017 at 9:52 am | Permalink
17. Tom Dilberger wrote:

    the mayor dislikes the Harmon’s
    ——————————–
    #15 – The mayor doesn’t “dislike” the Harmon’s. He’s just doing what his handlers tell him to do.

    Saturday, July 8, 2017 at 9:54 am | Permalink
18. Anonymous wrote:

    #4: the ramifications of “parking license to the taxpayers?

    Saturday, July 8, 2017 at 11:38 am | Permalink
19. admin wrote:

    Note:
    Two comments came in for this post under a real person’s name. I remind readers that if you comment under your real name you must include your email in the email field so I can verify it’s really you. Email addresses are never published.

    The person who sent the two comments at around 10:00 last night can email dave@commonsenseforbelmar.com to get them published.

    Thanks, everybody.

    Monday, July 10, 2017 at 3:39 am | Permalink

Post a Comment