Only Burke’s vote a no no.
-
Pages
Recent Comments
-
No recent comment found.
Archives
- January 2024
- January 2022
- December 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
26 Comments
Again I quote “It’s a mad house”
Where are these people going to park?
Too big
#2 Ask the planning board. I’m sure they thought about that. Uh Duh!!!!
Will there be amplified music? I certainly would not buy or rent a condo with a restaurant/bar below or outside my windows, next to a railroad as well! Seems like bad planning to me.
Ask Frank or Bill, they run the town.
the building site area will be raised about 4 feet with fill material to comply w/FEMA and a questionable number of municipal parking lot permits will be issued for reserved spaces.
My mind is still reeling about the passing of the LOKO thing without the planning board having details about what they are approving.
How much would you pay to live in Belmar, under a bridge, next to corner property housing restaurant/bar and view of the Police Dept parking lot?
Maybe it’s warehousing space that increases in value until government condemns it for parking, transit, etc.
from the Start:
1. the redeveloper owns a 20,000 square foot lot
2. then the Mayor & Council gives ’em 16,000 square feet of Belmar land for $1
3. NOW, the redeveloper has 46,000 square feet of land
4. redeveloper gets Planning Board carte blanche
5. Belmar gets high profile buildings that block viewscapes, a couple of bucks and additional parking burden
And the schools get?????
#11 point 3 should be 36,000. no?
And the people of Belmar are aware of all this, of course…
The monster on 5th and Ocean set the building precedent for Belmar or so it seems.
You mean 5th and Main?
No I mean 5th and Ocean Avenue monstrosity.
#13 …. you are correct! …. thanks for being a watchman …. after 11pm the gremlins sneak in
#16 Are you referring to the building sitting between 5th and 6th on Ocean Ave? AKA Taylor Pavillion which is one
story high?
Why more retail space? There’s plenty available in town.
The next thing the mayor will want is the tax payers to pay for a multi level garage because of the poor planning. Vote him out
#19, Exactly, there is plenty of unrented floor space awl ovur town. More retail now is just ridiculous. Not only here in town. Just look everywhere. Especially up and down Rt.35. There are even billdings that have been built and never occupied. But the building goes on.
Wasn’t there some kind of attempt by the developer to only have residential? And please correct me if im wrong but wasnt it Brennan and Mcgovern that said no to those changes??
Ok. I just read the previous article about the vote to have only residential. It was Brennan and Nicoly that voted against it! I stand corrected. So there we go. Another poor decision. We need another restaurant like we need a hole in the head.
Not only restaurant, but restaurant/bar. We don’t need that, but maybe someone does. Overflow parking can proceed to Inlet Terrace.
#23 Callmecynical. That is why Belmar is the smallest municipality in NJ with the most amount of alcoholics. Very sad.
#23 Years ago on the site where Kleins Bar & Restaurant is today was a Bar and
Liquor store. It was like the B.A. Big and busy. There was a law then that no one entered there in shorts after 7PM
If they would wear wrap skirts they could enter and drink if not they were turned away. They wore the skirts.Men too. They also used all of the parking
in the area including Inlet Terrace. The Borough made No Parking on 5th Ave. as far as the Lake if I remember correctly. That took care of Dudley’s
It burned down in later years and 5th
Ave. was reopened. Moral where there is a will there is a way.
The Planning Board can impose parking requirements only for building floor area. Open-air beer gardens have virtually unlimited occupancy.
Bar A NORTH is coming!
Post a Comment