Skip to content

Rivera’s Letter

Click to open in Google drive:rivera

 

10 Comments

  1. Jim Bean wrote:

    Ask Mr. Dupont what happens when you give an opinion based on what the mayor wants to hear and not what is the law. Whether this opinion is a funky chicken dance or not, he never did explain, under what NJSA context the petition is allowed to be rejected.

    In other words, since the offense can’t score a touchdown, the whole game should be thrown out, so says the opinion of the sportscaster who loves the team.

    Friday, April 1, 2016 at 4:39 pm | Permalink
  2. Love the Beach wrote:

    Read through it once. Perhaps I will try it again later. Or, hope someone can paraphrase it for easy understanding, or is it just a bunch of BS?

    Friday, April 1, 2016 at 5:33 pm | Permalink
  3. Anonymous wrote:

    I’d be more interested to know if the borough has the ability to “reject” a petition. The next petition should be a recall.

    Friday, April 1, 2016 at 6:16 pm | Permalink
  4. admin wrote:

    I guess we’ll find out soon enough.

    Friday, April 1, 2016 at 6:51 pm | Permalink
  5. ALLTRUMPEDUP wrote:

    Wow, does this guy realize there’s an empty seat on the US Supreme Court. He should give Obama a call not. A Constitutional Wiz!!!!

    Friday, April 1, 2016 at 8:43 pm | Permalink
  6. Voter wrote:

    The petition stands.

    Saturday, April 2, 2016 at 5:54 pm | Permalink
  7. Fed Up wrote:

    Here’s my legal opinion. Client privilege occurs in a municipality where there is a lawsuit, employee matters, PRIVILEGED issues, etc.

    Since none of that exists regarding the petition and the matter is not client privileged it must be private. Send the legal bill directly to Colleen Connolly and Matt Doherty for personal payment for their private request for a legal opinion from Mr. Rivera in a matter that personally affects only Matt Doherty getting a lot of money and Colleen’s future employment.

    Saturday, April 2, 2016 at 6:15 pm | Permalink
  8. Neighbor wrote:

    #7. New in town? Great idea but if we bill them personally, it will be paid by probably the boardwalk reconstruction bond, marina bond or pehaps tourism. Welcome to Belmar

    Saturday, April 2, 2016 at 6:46 pm | Permalink
  9. excuse me wrote:

    No no no, there will be a fundraiser sponsored by D’Jais for legal fees.

    Saturday, April 2, 2016 at 7:24 pm | Permalink
  10. niccolo' wrote:

    Paid by summer campaign in the works, no?

    Saturday, April 2, 2016 at 10:10 pm | Permalink

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.