Skip to content

10th Avenue Shingles Damaged

Officials are at the scene.

27 Comments

  1. Anonymous wrote:

    Meeting of the minds…lol

    Tuesday, March 14, 2017 at 2:01 pm | Permalink
  2. ALL TRUMPED UP wrote:

    So much for quality union workmanship. Epic may have skimped on the nails to put a little more green in Matt’s “pawket”. And what happens two years down the road when Epic is “in the wind” and we are held holding the “leaky” bag?

    Tuesday, March 14, 2017 at 2:14 pm | Permalink
  3. OLD MAN wrote:

    Very strong shingle? Garbage. Should have installed a metal roof. Why not it’s only money

    Tuesday, March 14, 2017 at 2:19 pm | Permalink
  4. Maria wrote:

    Maybe they were installed in the fall-winter season too late to bind together

    Tuesday, March 14, 2017 at 2:53 pm | Permalink
  5. gauche wrote:

    When I put a new roof on my house the building code stated 8 nails per shingle. Eight nails to stand up to hurricane force winds. I wonder how many nails per shingle are on the 10th Ave pavilion roof? Hope it meets code.

    Tuesday, March 14, 2017 at 2:58 pm | Permalink
  6. eugene creamer wrote:

    Don’t see anyone from Epic or Maser getting wet.

    Tuesday, March 14, 2017 at 3:02 pm | Permalink
  7. OLD MAN wrote:

    Glue the damn things down……………

    Tuesday, March 14, 2017 at 3:53 pm | Permalink
  8. gauche wrote:

    Correcting myself (actually my wife is correcting me). We put on very thick shingles and eight nails per shingle were required. I thought is was due to code. Apparently not. My bad. But still, new shingles on a wind exposed building get damaged by the wind. Not good.

    Tuesday, March 14, 2017 at 4:19 pm | Permalink
  9. Anonymous wrote:

    Epic was there yesterday.

    Tuesday, March 14, 2017 at 5:14 pm | Permalink
  10. Ahead of Schedule... wrote:

    …and below budget!! hahahaha that is a joke now. Would rather have had a good job!

    Tuesday, March 14, 2017 at 6:04 pm | Permalink
  11. legion wrote:

    Below budget because DPW is doing some of the work and the expense may be hidden in the beach utility?

    Tuesday, March 14, 2017 at 9:02 pm | Permalink
  12. Buddy wrote:

    You can’t do a roofing job properly unless the daytime temp is 70 degrees.

    Tuesday, March 14, 2017 at 9:36 pm | Permalink
  13. Anonymous wrote:

    Don’t worry about the future financial outlook and outgo in Belmar. Collen will be the New Chief Financial Officer when her schooling is finished in anticipation of Robin’s retirement. As told to Judge Gummer the Boardwalk was, in Collen’s view, an Accoutrement of the Pavilions. √áreative finances from the wizard and his handler here she comes.

    Wednesday, March 15, 2017 at 8:11 am | Permalink
  14. Anonymous wrote:

    That is impossible that the roof blew off! We paid $1M in engineering and inspection costs. We have all been scammed!!

    Wednesday, March 15, 2017 at 9:09 am | Permalink
  15. Anonymous wrote:

    Little Red Ridinghood comes to mind with the Paviliongate. Maybe some wolves blew the shingles down not MOTHER NATURE.

    Wednesday, March 15, 2017 at 10:48 am | Permalink
  16. Anonymous wrote:

    Now I’m wondering if Matt writes off his Jeep as some sort of job expense.

    Wednesday, March 15, 2017 at 11:11 am | Permalink
  17. legion wrote:

    #16 Why not, after all, he is around and about town on borough business all the time, like “fundraising”, etc., as well as all that good-doing he is famous for. Could be that the borough pays for the jeep’s lease?

    #15 Maybe some disgruntled persons who contributed to the Buy a Board project were disillusioned when the mayor boldly proclaimed a couple of meetings ago that such donations would be used to pay for the 5th Avenue pavilion, in defiance of Judge Gummer’s prohibition of using those funds in that manner. Lawless is as lawless does. The wind is neutral.

    Wednesday, March 15, 2017 at 12:09 pm | Permalink
  18. excuse me wrote:

    Were there not loose large propane tanks at the boat storage area where the fire happened? See the first picture. Is that a violation?

    Wednesday, March 15, 2017 at 12:42 pm | Permalink
  19. OLD MAN wrote:

    As in the first Planet Of The Apes. IT’S A MADHOUSE.

    Wednesday, March 15, 2017 at 1:40 pm | Permalink
  20. Anonymous wrote:

    The Mayfair had wind shear damages to the Oceanfront facade.

    Wednesday, March 15, 2017 at 3:21 pm | Permalink
  21. excuse me wrote:

    The MATThouse is still vulnerable to the forces of nature. And possible negligence.

    Wednesday, March 15, 2017 at 3:50 pm | Permalink
  22. Tom Dilberger wrote:

    Both pavilions were a dumb idea. They’ll be nothing but trouble.

    Wednesday, March 15, 2017 at 4:48 pm | Permalink
  23. Eugene Creamer wrote:

    Major design flaws with the 10th Avenue Pavilion:

    1. The observation tower is obsolete for the same reason as lighthouses …. replaced by technology …. a PTZ webcam atop the Mayfair would provide superior waterfront views …. 24 hours a day.
    2. Like the old Taylor Pavilion …. the eatery would be better located at the north end of the building to take advantage of the building’s shadow shade …. also, the southern roof is not a candidate for solar power.
    3. Except for EMS personnel mustering, the elevated First Aid room is a waste for the same reason hospitals have emergency entrances at ground level …. if you can climb stairs and ramps, you probably don’t need first aid. A ambulance docking port with electric hook-up would make more sense

    Thursday, March 16, 2017 at 9:59 am | Permalink
  24. Anonymous wrote:

    Bill Mckim, Our resident owner of the PTZ system, ready willing and able… for a small fee, we are sure. May even be a backup, fail safe or redundant surveillance.

    Thursday, March 16, 2017 at 10:41 am | Permalink
  25. belmarguy wrote:

    I’ve seen that SUV before!

    Friday, March 17, 2017 at 6:06 pm | Permalink
  26. Anonymous wrote:

    Is that the Milagro Spa SUV?

    Friday, March 17, 2017 at 7:37 pm | Permalink
  27. A Voter 2 wrote:

    Order change, make observation roof flat for drones landing zones.

    Friday, March 17, 2017 at 10:55 pm | Permalink

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.