Skip to content

20 Day Post Election Reports

Jennifer Nicolay’s:

j1j2j3j4

And Tom Burke’s:

t1t2t3t4

30 Comments

  1. Resident wrote:

    Let’s just get all the public records out in the open, I’ve had it.

    Pension Details
    Overview
    Michael B Campbell was born in 1957 and retired from Monmouth County/hall of Records on 04/07 after serving 25 years. Campbell collects a member pension that is funded by the PFRS – Police and Firemen’s Retirement System.

    Campbell’s monthly pension payment of $6,890.92 – based off a salary of $123,501 – is 5.1 times greater than the average pension for retirees from Monmouth County/hall of Records ($1,357.92) and 3.2 times greater than the average New Jersey pension ($2,170.75). On this payment plan, Campbell collects $82,691 annually. Pensioners from Monmouth County/hall of Records have retired, on average, with a salary of $41161.3 after 19 years of service.
    Pensioner Details
    Pensioner Name Michael B Campbell
    Birth Year 1957
    Years of Service 25 years
    Retirement Date 04/07
    Retirement Cause Special – applies to PFRS & SPRS only
    Member Key 487401
    Employer Details
    Last Employer Monmouth County/hall of Records
    Salary for Calculation $123,501
    Fund Type PFRS
    Benefit Type Member
    Pension Details
    Monthly
    Monthly Total Pension Payments $6,890.92
    Monthly Pension Allowance $6,689.63
    Monthly Cost of Living Allowance $201.29
    Last Disbursement 2013-12
    Last Standard Allowance 2013-12
    Year-To-Date
    YTD Total Payments $82,691
    YTD Pension Payments $80,275.6
    YTD Cost of Living Payments $2,415.48

    Wednesday, December 2, 2015 at 5:19 pm | Permalink
  2. say what wrote:

    Just so we understand. This doesn’t include the 6 figure salary that Mike Campbell is getting from Belmar as a DPW director. I wonder how much he will make as a Public Safety Officer that was rumored. Must be nice.

    Wednesday, December 2, 2015 at 6:42 pm | Permalink
  3. say what wrote:

    What I dont’t understand is how was Mikes salary 3 times the amount of other workers there. How could he make 123k if the average employee makes 41k.

    Wednesday, December 2, 2015 at 6:51 pm | Permalink
  4. Resident wrote:

    Off blog topic but I’ve had it. Already posted as a comment on this blog but here it is again.

    So much is available on the internet especially for public employees

    Michael D Druz
    Annual Total Pension Payments: $64,255
    Salary for Calculation: $97,491
    Last Employer: Department of Labor
    Retirement Date: 11/10
    See all New Jersey State Pensions

    ADVERTISEMENT
    Pension Details
    Other Department of Labor Pensions
    See all NJ Pensions
    Pension Details
    Overview
    Michael D Druz was born in 1949 and retired from Department of Labor on 11/10 after serving 36 years. Druz collects a member pension that is funded by the PERS – Public Employee Retirement System.

    Druz’s monthly pension payment of $5,354.61 – based off a salary of $97,491 – is 2.2 times greater than the average pension for retirees from Department of Labor ($2,489.82) and 2.5 times greater than the average New Jersey pension ($2,170.75). On this payment plan, Druz collects $64,255 annually. Pensioners from Department of Labor have retired, on average, with a salary of $59511 after 27 years of service.
    Pensioner Details
    Pensioner Name Michael D Druz
    Birth Year 1949
    Years of Service 36 years
    Retirement Date 11/10
    Retirement Cause Service
    Member Key 559947
    Employer Details
    Last Employer Department of Labor
    Salary for Calculation $97,491
    Fund Type PERS
    Benefit Type Member
    Pension Details
    Monthly
    Monthly Total Pension Payments $5,354.61
    Monthly Pension Allowance $5,354.61
    Last Disbursement 2013-12
    Last Standard Allowance 2013-12
    Year-To-Date
    YTD Total Payments $64,255.3
    YTD Pension Payments $64,255.3

    Wednesday, December 2, 2015 at 7:10 pm | Permalink
  5. Anonymous wrote:

    Should Mike not get paid by Belmar because he has a pension from his previous job??? Mike is getting paid by the town for the hard work he is doing now. What he gets from a previous job should not be anyone’s concern.

    Wednesday, December 2, 2015 at 8:32 pm | Permalink
  6. Belmarguy wrote:

    Mike does not work hard, lol…

    Thursday, December 3, 2015 at 4:49 am | Permalink
  7. South Side wrote:

    It’s called ‘New Jersey Pension Double Dipping’ and not illegal.

    Thursday, December 3, 2015 at 6:47 am | Permalink
  8. OLD MAN wrote:

    #5 What you don’t understand ..many people are unemployed and he should not double dip and give a younger person a chance to work. In the final analysis. NJ is broke and all this will come to an end real soon. Again #5 It’s all politics

    Thursday, December 3, 2015 at 7:53 am | Permalink
  9. Anonymous wrote:

    #6, if the job called for actual hard work, that guy wouldn’t be anywhere near it.

    Thursday, December 3, 2015 at 8:10 am | Permalink
  10. Anonymous wrote:

    Is that why he’s purple all the time or is it his pressure that’s going to pop?

    Thursday, December 3, 2015 at 9:36 am | Permalink
  11. Anonymous wrote:

    What’s even more disturbing is the use of borough vehicles. I’ve seen family members in these vehicles late at night and outside of Belmar. Definitely not on official duty or work related. Add the cost of gas, insurance, and just normal wear and tear on these vehicles because that has value. Add that to their salaries and they have some gig.

    Friday, December 4, 2015 at 8:27 am | Permalink
  12. Guest wrote:

    11 What even more disturbing is Mr Campbell is big on that rule of use of Boro vehicles for personal use during or after work unless its him of course or one of his buddies from work.Ive seen Mr Campbell a hundred times during work hours down at the dog training park in Wall Township near Evans Area with his dog that he brings to the office everyday.So he’s using boro vehicle for personal use,doing personal things during hours he supposed to be working and using gas the boro pays for.And we see him all over in his Boro truck all the time as well as seeing the vehicles at homedepot in neptune at night,a and p in wall,even as far as Point Pleasant but I guess thats because chosen few can take thier trucks home at night.He loves to enforce the rules and law like the cop that he is,But he can do whatever he wants.And I promise you he does whatever he wants and helps himself to whatever he wants whenever he wants it and has his employees do it for him.

    Friday, December 4, 2015 at 9:04 am | Permalink
  13. Anonymous wrote:

    document with that cell phone, video, etc, unless of course, you are strong armed to put it away Ala djais

    Friday, December 4, 2015 at 9:56 am | Permalink
  14. excuse me wrote:

    Let us not forget about the prior late or non-reporting of campaign contributions by Nicolay and two other people which were subject to large fines. Did that magically go away? Did a mysterious donor pay the fines for them? I do not have a short memory, like regarding the poor or no accounting of $10,000 worth of Shoprite gift cards that “disappeared.”

    Friday, December 4, 2015 at 11:41 am | Permalink
  15. say what wrote:

    Don’t forget. The truck that Mike Campbell uses is Franny Hines old truck. Franny Hines got a new truck because he said that the old truck was ruined in the Sandy Storm. So after Mr. Hines got his new truck some how the old truck was good enough to drive and Mr. Campbell took it.

    Friday, December 4, 2015 at 11:47 am | Permalink
  16. Anonymous wrote:

    The dog you speak of is the dog that is the geese police after cam passed that is why the dog is at work or the lake or at the park. By the way there is no charge to the town for this service

    Friday, December 4, 2015 at 11:54 am | Permalink
  17. Guest wrote:

    16 Are you serious?

    Friday, December 4, 2015 at 2:53 pm | Permalink
  18. Say what wrote:

    #16 that is not true. The dog that mike bought is his dog. With his money. You might see him walking the dog around the lake thats because he lives a block away from the lake.

    Friday, December 4, 2015 at 3:17 pm | Permalink
  19. Say what wrote:

    He was also seen at the dog park in wall (only for wall residents) playing with his dog at around 11 oclock while on boro time. So you say it doesnt cost belmar anything but belmar was paying mike to train his dog in wall. Plus mike has a employee walk his dog during work hours. I didnt know that was in the job description

    Friday, December 4, 2015 at 3:20 pm | Permalink
  20. Michael D Druz wrote:

    #4 Resident the fact you posted my State of New Jersey pension serves what purpose ? Afraid of using your name, but hiding behind a fake moniker, who knows where you are a resident, have courage and be honest !

    Sunday, December 6, 2015 at 1:50 am | Permalink
  21. belmarguy wrote:

    20, its public information bro. No need to get all defensive.. Take it up with OPRA!

    Sunday, December 6, 2015 at 7:50 am | Permalink
  22. A Voter 2 wrote:

    #20 Michael why is so important you know #4’s name are you going to egg their house or try to find out more embarrassing info on them? You were paid by US, the taxpayers we have every right to know how OUR money is being spent.

    Sunday, December 6, 2015 at 8:33 am | Permalink
  23. legion wrote:

    My penny’s worth today: Benjamin Franklin wrote Poor Richard’s Almanac under the pseudonym Richard Saunders. What is wrong with speaking truth, relaying information and exposing wrongdoing under a false name? Making a jerk of oneself under one’s actual name is a service to all, as people will know who he/she is and can say, “Oh, that is so and so, the dumbass or troublemaker,” and stay away from him/her. On the other hand, giving a sarcastic jab to someone pseudonymously is OK, in my opinion, as sometimes no one else has the nerve to do so and the object of the jab will just continue being a jerk or whatever otherwise, thinking he is just a wonderful and righteous person. Meanness for the sake of meanness is nasty, pointless and maybe hurtful. Also, a bit of boasting under an actual name is OK, giving the ego a boost, perhaps, or effective for resume building. I am not pointing out any specific individuals here, by the way, so no one gets his/her undies in a knot and comes back at old-fake-name-me.

    Sunday, December 6, 2015 at 12:28 pm | Permalink
  24. Guest wrote:

    23 Although I think many people agree with you and this post.Unfortunately many of us post under a false name because of fear of retaliation.I know and have learned first hand what happens when you stand up and come forth with actual facts about wrong doings in this town,they shut you down and they will make your life miserable.And in my case even more extreme measure.So all I am saying is its not always because some people on here are cowards or trouble makers and liars.I think we all know how the system and the people that run our town work.

    Sunday, December 6, 2015 at 12:59 pm | Permalink
  25. legion wrote:

    #24 Agreed, I left out that part. Thanks for adding it. I know about retaliation, which can take many forms.

    Sunday, December 6, 2015 at 1:52 pm | Permalink
  26. Michael D Druz wrote:

    #22 Voter, there is a majorfact you, and it seems many are forget that I, as well as all public employees are taxpayers, also.
    Also unlike, many of the anonymous posters, I do not look to embarrass anyone, nor would I ever stoop so low as to cause physical damage to their property. The reason I would talk with the individual is to answer his questions about my pension, and show that individual what they missed in the information provided. If you #20 Voter would like I will give the explanation to you personally and you may relay it.

    Monday, December 7, 2015 at 9:53 am | Permalink
  27. Tom Dilberger wrote:

    Sir, you are correct about public employees also being taxpayers. However, it is the tax dollars of the privately employed that count more in the equation. Without the privately earned tax dollar, the tax dollar of the public employee doesn’t exist. There are always public employees, but once the public employee becomes a burden to the taxpayers at large, it will drive out that tax base as we see happening today. Therein lies the problem. We can no longer the salaries and pensions of the ever increasing public servants.
    _______________________________________
    As I’ve said before, public employees are not the only fiscal problem facing the taxpayers. That element of the New Jersey population (welfare recipients) who do no work and have never worked and never will work is also increasing beyond the capacity of our taxpayers to support.

    Monday, December 7, 2015 at 10:50 am | Permalink
  28. A Voter 2 wrote:

    #26 no one said you and others don’t pay taxes,there is no need for an explanation needed, the facts speak for themselves.

    Monday, December 7, 2015 at 10:59 am | Permalink
  29. Resident wrote:

    #26 If you have information just post it.

    Monday, December 7, 2015 at 11:48 am | Permalink
  30. Anonymous wrote:

    20 and 26 need a new name to answer your own statements

    Monday, December 7, 2015 at 10:28 pm | Permalink

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.