Skip to content

2012 DEP Public Trust Rules To Be Reinstated

Arguments over allocation of parking revenues and

pavilion costs in Susko case depended on them.


Gummer decision safe.


Screen Shot 2016-01-09 at 6.20.38 AM

Read the bill here:Screen Shot 2016-01-09 at 6.24.48 AM


  1. Anonymous wrote:

    On the cutting edge as usual. You are reporting it like it is not marketing.

    Saturday, January 9, 2016 at 7:55 am | Permalink
  2. Tom Burke wrote:

    Lines 19 through 25 of Assembly Bill 4927 would seem to provide for the re-building of our pavilions outside the scope of DEP regulations. Perhaps more clarification is in order.

    Sunday, January 10, 2016 at 6:43 am | Permalink
  3. Eugene Creamer wrote:

    #2 …. Good luck with any attempt to directly ask Maser a question at the January 19th M&C meeting.

    Sunday, January 10, 2016 at 8:56 am | Permalink
  4. callmecynical wrote:

    C’mon…super-bender team Colleen-Matt can find their way around any rules/laws. Or just break them and not be accountable. The council will just nod and vote “yes”, unaware of or ignoring any laws. The mayor can leave office and leave them looking bad or stupid or ignorant, in my opinion.

    Sunday, January 10, 2016 at 11:28 am | Permalink

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.