Skip to content

A “Stringed” Bean?

A nutty comment that came in yesterday on the PolitickerNJ story:

Screen Shot 2014-09-01 at 11.44.16 AM

BTW, do you think that’s the same Janet that was the Magovern/Blackburn campaign treasurer last year and this year was on the “Rebuild Belmar Pavilions” committee and is currently treasurer for the Belmar Democratic Committee?

Naw, I doubt it.


  1. Anonymous wrote:

    Wait, Doherty doesn’t twist facts around ?!!! This Janet person is funny.

    Monday, September 1, 2014 at 12:51 pm | Permalink
  2. madame.snark wrote:

    Another Doherty stooge comes to his aid. She must read this blog, picked up the term “puppet master” here, as the Mayor, of course, and his panel of puppets. Can’t even be original!

    Monday, September 1, 2014 at 2:08 pm | Permalink
  3. Anonymous wrote:

    So folks:
    Not that I am a super sleuth ,but I am a super sleuth. Janet is the newest creation of the “Notorious Brendan Read”, I wish it were not sooo obvious.
    Brendan has sooo much fun creating these
    different posters: remember ” Mark” followed by “Who is watching You” and Buster. So Brendan…” Janet ” and whoever you choose to be tomorrow…, your fingerprint is just that, one of a kind. Janet would never pen that nonsense.

    Monday, September 1, 2014 at 3:06 pm | Permalink
  4. Shrugged wrote:

    She had me till Pringle and teaparty republican was used in the same sentence. That is the moment her argument falls apart.

    Monday, September 1, 2014 at 3:14 pm | Permalink
  5. Bill Straus wrote:

    Oh my God Blunder Read is at it again. There are 2 count them 2 Tea Party People in this town, me and Teddy and Teddy is a registered Independent. So that means my strings are the only republican ones being pulled. Boy Ken I wish you would get your act together cause I can barely walk, maybe he should use heavy weight string. Pinocchio Read lets go with a good one. Pffft

    Monday, September 1, 2014 at 3:24 pm | Permalink
  6. admin wrote:

    Just to fair, we don’t know who sent that comment, so we shouldn’t beat up on Read or Grosshandler over it. Anyway they’ve both put enough nutty stuff out there with their name on it to poke fun at. Let’s just assume it’s some disinterested observer named Janet.

    Monday, September 1, 2014 at 3:50 pm | Permalink
  7. madame.snark wrote:

    If that mis-identity is so, then I was even more correct – that gentleman is Doherty’s biggest stooge. But he still lives in Belmar’s next urination zone if the beer hall is established on Ocean Ave. Mis-handled or not mis-handled, that is not the question. Urine still smells.

    Monday, September 1, 2014 at 3:34 pm | Permalink
  8. Anonymous wrote:

    About Brendan. In that Matt lost out on that pavilion vote, might this be an opportunity for Brendan to be our toadie, or at least a dual toadie? After all, toadies are notorious front runners. If he thinks Matt may be vulnerable and even lose the election, he’ll have to have a place to land. Maybe, he could take both sides during meetings. I don’t think he’d be the least embarrassed. I can see him now standing there talking for and against both sides.

    Monday, September 1, 2014 at 4:05 pm | Permalink
  9. madame.snark wrote:

    Yep…chortle chortle chortle. Who knows.

    Monday, September 1, 2014 at 4:37 pm | Permalink
  10. Dave the Fraud wrote:

    Yup, you certainly know “nutty” when you see it.

    Monday, September 1, 2014 at 5:20 pm | Permalink
  11. admin wrote:

    I do know nutty when I see it.

    Monday, September 1, 2014 at 6:42 pm | Permalink
  12. VITO CORLEONE wrote:

    According to some members of the five families this guy Bean does not need anybody speaking for him. He is one tough guy.

    Monday, September 1, 2014 at 6:11 pm | Permalink
  13. Anonymous wrote:

    Well, there is the stylistic quality. The thread of insanity mixed with a sense of the scandal expose’ and not mention the resident bad boy view. I’m sticking to my knowing the pathetic author.

    Monday, September 1, 2014 at 7:34 pm | Permalink

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.