-
Pages
Recent Comments
-
No recent comment found.
Archives
- January 2022
- December 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
Common Sense For New Hampshire
Liberty Begins At Home
18 Comments
I thought the applicant was rude to Mr Lomas. Almost as if Mr Lomas was an impediment. The applicant objected that his line of questioning had nothing to do with the application at hand. Did he not think that his questioning had everything to do with the impact on his life? The least he could do would have been to politely entertain his questions before he went off and made tons of money. But he couldn’t even do that. I think this whole meeting was a disgrace. Spot zoning at its finest. And the nerve to say that code enforcement would be the check and balance that all the agreed upon conditions of the applications were upheld. How has that been going with respect to all the DJais additions made through the years to their outdoor area that were never approved.
1 – Please leave D’jais out of this …. they are their own code enforcement.
Another application where there is significant objections from residents that fall on deaf ears.
Djais is untouchable just ask the mayor or Frank.
The DAZ or Djais Autonomous Zone is untouchable. All authorities with the intention of enforcing the law should stay away and mind their own business.
#4. Frank who? Frank Sementa or do nothing, overpaid Frank Cinelli?
#6 great question
Yes, they were rude and impatient with Mr. Lomas. He was fighting to retain the value of his property and the quality of life for his family.
Start listening at 3 hours, 30 minutes, 30 seconds, where Mr. Lomas states that the mayor told him that the project was going to go through whether he liked it or not. Gee, how did the mayor know what the decision would be?
Sounds like the rat Doherty under another name, like in “Salt will never open”…I am discouraged and have concluded that all politicians suck, something I have known deep down. Want to know who will reign in hell? Politicians. (I don’t believe in hell, by the way, but there should be a separate planet for such characters, them only, to deal with each other.)
Mr. Lomas was not treated rudely at all. He was throwing darts with a blindfold on. Many of his “questions” were simply not relevant to the matter at hand, or had been addressed in the Redevelopment Agreement. He simply doesn’t want the building there, despite the fact they gave him multiple concessions over the past year and a half. Mr. Lomas bought a home next to an undeveloped/abandoned lot. What did he think was going to happen at some point? He is like the people who buy next to an airport, then complain about the noise.
To those that may be interested in my questions regarding the proposed elimination of a SIGHT TRIANGLE at the intersection of Main Street & Ninth Avenue … below is a copy of Belmar’s Development Code for corner lots.
Belmar town fathers knew that sight triangles were necessary for safe street intersections … and the diagonal parking on 9th would have motorists blindly backing into traffic … ala Jersey Mikes.
Chapter 40 Article 7.5
Sight Triangle at Intersections.
Unless more stringent regulations are provided by other provisions of this chapter, at the intersection of two or more streets, no hedge, fence, screening strip or wall higher than 30 inches above curb level, nor any obstruction to vision, other than a post not exceeding one foot in diameter, shall be permitted on any lot within the triangular area formed by two intersecting street lines bounding said lot, or the projection of such lines, and by a line connecting a point, on each line located 25 feet from the intersection of the street lines.
#10 13TH AVENUE
He could expect that something might be built there according to current zoning rules. He could not foresee that the Borough would write a new set of rules to conform with what a developer wants to build.
#12 – totally agree. And that is why I will not vote for an incumbent that Is currently mayor and council. I’ve drawn a chalk line as of tonight. If your sitting on the Dias right now, I will not vote for you. That starts this fall with Brennan. Who’s with me?
13 – Agree
#13 I’m an average guy who is with you in an above average way
#8 Yes, this decision was made long ago by Walsifer, Kirshenbaum, McKracken, Wann, and Carvelli in concert with the developer (Taylor Family and Matrix). Nothing I said that night was going to make any sort of difference. The ‘fix’ was in when the council approved the redevelopment plan written by the developer that was tailor suited to the building they wanted to build (30 units, 4 stories).
The ‘concessions’ that were supposedly made were vapor. Moving the setback from 30ft to 40 was necessary to have a driving lane in the parking lot. You can’t fit a parking spot and driving lane in 30ft, you need 40. Hardly a concession.
I attended the previous meeting about the lots on 7th and listened to the planning board question and debate garbage cans, parking, traffic flow, and drainage for hours. I expected them to have the same concern for this property, not tell me that those things aren’t their concern. I expected to have community input on a redevelopment plan that is supposed to benefit the community. I expected a building in line with what was built on 5th or 8th. And what I expected was a fair process that took resident concerns seriously.
#13-15 I’m with you. This crew needs to go. But that won’t be enough. I think we need non-partisan elections. I think we need an ordinance requiring community input on redevelopment plans since they re-write zoning laws. I think we need to not only re-examine the current zoning laws and master plan, but more importantly to actually enforce and listen to them! We need council to be transparent in their decisions and listen to the community instead of ignoring and brushing them off.
Yep – unfortunately, Belmar politics hasn’t changed over the past decade or so. Really missing Kenny.
16. Brett Lomas – You are right. This was already decided and nothing anyone said was going to change their plans.
Post a Comment