Skip to content

Belmar Taping Its Meetings



Not quite ready to retire and entrust the job to them so for now we’ll have a two camera shoot.

And BTW, some one please tell John Bonevich that Belmar is a borough, not a township.


  1. Tom Dilberger wrote:

    Yeah, sure, they’ll tape the meetings alright, but don’t count on them. Anytime something important comes up, their system will be down for some mysterious reason that no one can figure out. Thanks much Dave for keeping your blog going. Will there be a comment section on the government tape/blog?

    Thursday, January 5, 2017 at 6:22 pm | Permalink
  2. Anonymous wrote:

    Is this another sweetheart pay job with associated health and other pension costs as well? If it’s a Professional rate for the position was it done illegally by resolution?

    Thursday, January 5, 2017 at 8:12 pm | Permalink
  3. Eugene Creamer wrote:

    The Borough never took advantage of Cablevision or Verizon franchise agreements to provide municipal TV channels.

    Thursday, January 5, 2017 at 10:53 pm | Permalink
  4. Anonymous wrote:

    TV broadcasting franchise? Does the vendor own content?

    Friday, January 6, 2017 at 8:52 am | Permalink
  5. Eugene Creamer wrote:

    #4 …. Belmar already has franchise agreements with Cablevision and Verizon.

    Federal law permits municipalities to require provisions for public, educational, and governmental access (“PEG access”) channels and equipment as part of the franchise agreement.(47 U.S.C.A. §531)

    Manasquan and other towns take advantage of the law and use PEG access.

    Friday, January 6, 2017 at 10:27 pm | Permalink
  6. An Observation wrote:

    The less people know what is going on in Belmar, the better for Matt.

    Saturday, January 7, 2017 at 12:31 pm | Permalink
  7. Teddy Ehmann wrote:

    Matt’s performance on MSNBC Steve Kornacki’s show was so entertaining, he should not shy from local televised appearances.

    Saturday, January 7, 2017 at 3:22 pm | Permalink
  8. Anonymous wrote:

    So Belmar doesn’t need a videographer. We have one Dave Schneck and he’s free and principled with ethics and integrity.

    Saturday, January 7, 2017 at 3:46 pm | Permalink
  9. elemental wrote:

    I would be concerned about “conflicting” tapes that could be used in future courtroom appearances. I trust the administration not one bit. Remember the Watergate tapes and the missing 18 minutes?

    Saturday, January 7, 2017 at 4:20 pm | Permalink
  10. Another Sleaze Deal wrote:

    This had to be a friend of someone in Town Machine or union person and probably a sole source contract too. Stupid.

    Saturday, January 7, 2017 at 6:38 pm | Permalink
  11. alfred e neuman wrote:

    Along with the Borough videos can be a companion magazine, “Matt Magazine.” Smile big for the camera! What, him worry? Nah!

    Saturday, January 7, 2017 at 7:46 pm | Permalink
  12. Anonymous wrote:

    #9: I did not have sex with that woman.

    Monday, January 9, 2017 at 8:28 am | Permalink
  13. elemental wrote:

    #12 It depends what the meaning of “is” is.

    Monday, January 9, 2017 at 9:52 am | Permalink

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.