Common Sense For New Hampshire

20 Comments

1. Maria wrote:

   Everything is fine in belmar

   Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 1:15 pm | Permalink
2. OLD MAN wrote:

   Yes all is well. Let’s wait a month or two

   Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 1:45 pm | Permalink
3. FJW wrote:

   Yeah…the busiest time of the year for the town and our council is too busy to meet.

   I shake my head and wonder.

   Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 2:07 pm | Permalink
4. Anonymous wrote:

   If vendors have a “net 30” clause in their contracts, how does Belmar do business ? Is the borough paying vendors prior to voting on these payments ???

   Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 2:15 pm | Permalink
5. elemental wrote:

   The loading up of the early June agenda was a tip-off. Force through lots of stuff, then go into hiding. They know what’s best for Belmar.

   Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 2:24 pm | Permalink
6. Lawless wrote:

   Is there anyway to find out how are town stacks up with the rest of the state for cancelling meetings ?

   Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 2:37 pm | Permalink
7. admin wrote:

   Manasquan no cancellations or postponements in 2017.
   Sea Girt no cancellations or postponements in 2017.
   Spring Lake no cancellations or postponements in 2017.
   Avon no cancellations or postponements in 2017.
   Bradley Beach no cancellations or postponements in 2017.

   Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 3:18 pm | Permalink
8. Anonymous wrote:

   Yes #4, It’s the infamous “Jim Bean Rule” !
   Walsifer should ask that question but he won’t.

   Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 2:53 pm | Permalink
9. Eugene Creamer wrote:

   I’m waiting until 07:00 PM tonight before reading the alert.

   Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 2:56 pm | Permalink
10. Guest wrote:

    8 – Walsifer who?

    Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 4:39 pm | Permalink
11. ms.nobody wrote:

    #10 What’s one lone guy to do? At least make some noise or wait like an artful serpent to strike at the right moment.

    Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 5:15 pm | Permalink
12. Anonymous wrote:

    They don’t want meetings scheduled because they have to recuse themselves from voting due to influence peddling Pay-to-Play violations.

    Even those who donate despite knowing Belmar’s strict Pay-to-Play Ordinance can’t get their agenda through because the peddling backfired.

    Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 5:29 pm | Permalink
13. Anonymous wrote:

    For those individuals who have received the wrath of our vulnerable leader take a look at the wettest vs driest addresses in Belmar. Underground springs determine the wealth of your property. All Real Estate Professionals know where the high water table, high streets and underground springs are located.

    We’re you bamboozled by the lure of better Belmar’s future by your Real Estate Professional?

    Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 6:31 pm | Permalink
14. Anonymous wrote:

    #7 The facts say it all. Other local towns are on the up and up and Belmar is not. Council meetings should never be messed with, especially not during the busiest time of year.
    The people have a right to know what is going on around town. Belmar must be much more open and accountable. And it must stop cramming more bars into this tiny town

    Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 7:01 pm | Permalink
15. A Voter 2 wrote:

    If the council members that are involved in the lawsuit were smart they should be talking to the Prosecutor. The odds are against all being found innocent, and Matt will not protect them.

    Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 7:54 pm | Permalink
16. ms.perspicacity wrote:

    From #15 “The odds are against all being found innocent, and Matt will not protect them.”

    This reminds of the mayor’s statement to south end residents who are complaining about noise and disruption by bar patrons: They knew what they were getting into when they bought property in that neighborhood. Council members should be able to recognize whom they “work for”, and I don’t mean borough residents. Why complain when those council members may be found to be complicit in certain activities.

    Friday, June 16, 2017 at 10:08 am | Permalink
17. An Observation wrote:

    #16 You are right and if they are found guilty they will live in a new neighborhood and be told what to do instead of the other way around.

    Friday, June 16, 2017 at 11:42 am | Permalink
18. ms.perspicacity wrote:

    And it is not Mr. Rodger’s Neighborhood! Although real justice would be a long shot, in my opinion. “Just following orders” is a lame excuse.

    Friday, June 16, 2017 at 2:38 pm | Permalink
19. Anonymous wrote:

    With the drowning the town is in crisis and the council is MIA with this cancelled meeting. Truly irresponsible.We need leadership that is present, reliable, honest and that steps up every month to listen to the people of belmar

    Sunday, June 18, 2017 at 7:56 am | Permalink
20. Gospel wrote:

    #19, Why don’t you run, because that is the absolute truth.We need leaders not bar flies.

    Sunday, June 18, 2017 at 8:02 am | Permalink

Post a Comment