-
Pages
Recent Comments
-
No recent comment found.
Archives
- January 2022
- December 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
15 Comments
Look at 2:30:00 of the video. Magovern is adamant about having a developer build a free municipal building. He is still claiming we are getting tax dollars from this development. It’s frustrating to see how clueless he is. Please vote him out.
Quite simply: a vote for McGovern is more of the same. Same BA. Same redevelopment attitude ( its FREE ). Remember they told us Taylor was FREE too.
Mark Levis seems to have a bit on the ball. I was impressed that he held his ground and voted no on that motion to table the dumb tent/canopy baloney.
I haven’t heard one word on cutting costs. I agree with #1 Mr Magoo must go>>>>>>>far far away.
#3 I wonder what the motive was to table it?
I too am impressed so far with Mark Levis’ independent thinking.
Watching the town meetings makes me cring. Seeing Brian change from good old local boy to clueless Mayor Magoo.
As I understand from what I heard, the motive to table is to have more time to “negotiate.” The lawyer, a seemingly smart and informed person in his area of expertise, (maybe naive as I think he believed the former mayor), senses there may be some of that “wiggle room” that Brian referred to a year or two ago as a councilman. He gave me the impression that the borough may lose bigtime in this suit and face a huge payout, (another opinion of mine is that for some reason, the former mayor had it in his head to screw the Freeze Out guys, like the Salt guys). And unfortunately Mr. Cannon seems to trust creepy Colleen. The attorney may have integrity – why did Doherty not fire him? And yes, give Brian wiggle room and he will get lost.
#8 public grandstanding and trying the case in public opinion is what I heard. The case is not over a canopy!!!!
Canopy shmanopy – there is something else going on. Umbrellas? Give me a break. Is Jen naive? Duh…
#10
The 10th ave people were NOT afforded the same ability to operate as the Exit 98 people. Same pre-season lease, same resolutions passed yet there was not trailer and the Exit 98 containers remain.
They never even returned their building security (a building destroyed by Sandy) according to the suit.
But at the meeting they are making about a CANOPY!!!!!
What I don’t understand here is the discussion of the litigation at a public meeting. Throughout the 10 plus lawsuits ( I’ve lost count)whenever a question was a asked about a lawsuit the mayor and council and whatever attorney was present, would claim they couldn’t comment because of litigation. And here they went into in-depth conversation.
I agree Katrina. And the 10th Ave people weren’t even able to defend themselves. My guess is they know the screwed up and are going to have to pay. And it makes the plaintiffs seem like the unreasonable ones if it was “just over a canopy.”
Are We allowed to cinder block our front lawns now like the renovation is doing at 902 Ocean Ave.,or is that a special permit?
Spot zoning.
Post a Comment