Skip to content

Council Meeting Of March 1, 2016


  1. flower power wrote:

    In response to Councilman Magovern’s saying that he is not a tree hugger: Brian, please hug a tree; you might learn something. Really.

    Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 9:51 am | Permalink
  2. bela wrote:

    Enough with the emphasis on ethnicity. Isn’t a parade in March enough?

    Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 2:40 pm | Permalink
  3. MM wrote:

    Stop answering the councils questions when you go to speak at a council meeting!
    You owe them no explanation for anything! They represent you! It is not only your right to questions your representation, it’s your duty as a citizen.
    They put their names on a ballot not you! Let them ask Colleen and “their” attorney if they questions. The mayor refuses to answer questions he doesn’t like, why should you answer them?!?!?

    Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 4:08 pm | Permalink
  4. Independent wrote:

    In 1967, I registered for the vote. I registered Democrat. Forty years later, I moved to Belmar and Registered as a Republican. My thinking was that the minorities were just as bad off , if not worse than when I registered in 1967. That the Democratic Party Elites benefited over their promises to help the less fortunate. Sorry it took 40 years, but I do my homework. Five years after registering Republican, I registered as an Independent. It only took me five years to figure out the stupidity and foolery of the “Republican Elite”. It really doesn’t take a genius to figure out this next election.

    Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 4:19 pm | Permalink
  5. Anonymous wrote:

    ‘Just because the ordinance is being changed doesn’t mean that they are going to take those contributions.’

    Doesn’t seem like anything needs to be changed then.

    Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 4:21 pm | Permalink
  6. OLD MAN wrote:

    #4 Vote for the best… not the party. That’s the way I do it. Good

    Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 4:54 pm | Permalink
  7. Teddy Ehmann wrote:

    #5. Love your logic. Just because D’Jais gives out free drinks to local drunks, doesn’t mean that they are going to accept those drinks. I totally agree with you. Absolutely no reason to question.

    Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 6:15 pm | Permalink
  8. BEN REAL wrote:

    Dave, at the recent council meeting you stated there are “like”10 liquor licenses. I believe the actual number of licenses is around 15 if you include the club licenses and brewery. Three of the licenses operate two establishments each. This means that if/when all of the licenses are active there will be a total of 18 establishments serving alcohol in a one square mile town.

    Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 10:56 am | Permalink
  9. admin wrote:

    Thank you for the clarification.

    Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 11:02 am | Permalink
  10. Anonymous wrote:

    Did Brian just ask if Matt would have to give back contributions ?!!! As an elected official he should know how campaign funding and reporting works. Do yourself a favor Bri, pick up a candidates compliance manual and read it. (DO NOT ask Nicolay)

    Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 12:31 pm | Permalink
  11. Resident wrote:

    Ask Claire Diecke she wants to defend Matt’s integrity. I’m sure there is an non self-serving reason Matt changed the ordinance. We’re just not smart enough to know it. What is it Claire, please explain how this ordinance change benefits Belmar residents.

    Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 1:47 pm | Permalink
  12. MM wrote:

    #11 What you fail to understand and what Mrs. Diecke fails to understand is the concerns expressed by the residents, in the change to the ordinance have nothing to do with Matt, or any council person personally. This ordinance has worked! Changing it now opens up the appearance, not that anyone elected now might or would be influenced, but the appearance of a conflict! Leave the ordinance alone so that appearance doesn’t exist for anyone! Not for Matt, Brian, Jennifer, non of them serving now, or anyone who might serve in the future, regardless of their political party or opinions!

    Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 4:26 pm | Permalink
  13. Parade Fun wrote:

    Anyone swinging by Brandls in Sunday for the mayors private brunch ?

    Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 8:08 pm | Permalink
  14. #11-What can you be thinking? Changes in the pay-to-play ordinance benefit everyone-Democrats and Republicans alike. With the most stringent wording removed, candidates of all parties are on an even playing field.Matt and other candidates should be able to on the same level as other candidiates….it’s my understanding that candidates running for office at the county level don’t adhere to any pay-to-play restrictions-what’s the point of your argument? County reps also oversee building and street projects… You have no evidence or proof of what you state…..#12-You’re wrong-this criticism by the opposition is targeted at Matt-make no mistake-everything he’s done has been attacked by the opposition…the person who stated that only the people who support the mayor are assisted and supported..I can provide a list of individuals from the opposition who have been helped by the present and past mayor and council..thankfully this person didn’t boo and yell out from the audience as is her habit.also, The Women’s Caucus erred in their report about Jen Nicolay-yet members of the opposition won’t let it rest…Mike Seebeck-you scolded me for commenting about negativity-last I heard the freedoms stated in the Bill of Rights apply to me as well-I can disagree with your thinking and comments…take, for example, all of the good we tried to accomplish during and after Hurricane Sandy-constant criticism-when we were working our hardest to get residents back on their feet-bash, bash, bash-with your petition drive…this bashing is ongoing-give residents the correct information as you go door-to-door with your petition-with your last petition drive, your representatives gave incorrect information, and some didn’t have the foggiest when answering questions about what you were trying to sell…lastly, my name is spelled Deicke-11 & 12-if you choose to use fake names, at the very least, spell my ACTUAL name correctly-#11-your first sentence makes no sense..also, #11-I’ll give you all of the actions/endeavors of council members that benefit residents…including the pay-to-play-changes leave opportunities for more people (perspective candidates) to show interest in serving the community…

    Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 8:29 pm | Permalink
  15. Eugene Creamer wrote:

    all great evil is the perversion of a good.

    Friday, March 4, 2016 at 8:56 am | Permalink
  16. Claire Deicke wrote:

    #15-Evil? Perversion ? Really?? In an effort to sound intellectual you demonstrate stupidity…

    Friday, March 4, 2016 at 10:17 am | Permalink
  17. joe goofinoff wrote:

    #15 – BINGO!!!

    Friday, March 4, 2016 at 10:54 am | Permalink
  18. Mike Seebeck wrote:

    Hey Claire calling Gene Creamer stupid hmm not only is that classless and pathetic (aka negative) but you’re way out of your league on that one. In addition did you see Dave reported on the FACTUAL location of the mysterious $610. In your committee!! along with the other PAC contributions. I guess you plan on using all your PAC friends to crush the residents when the pay to play issue goes to a vote. Good luck with that. BTW you can comment on any thing you want.

    Friday, March 4, 2016 at 11:19 am | Permalink
  19. MM wrote:

    Mrs. Deicke, I apologize for spelling your name incorrectly. There maybe some people who are criticizing the mayor for the changes, but MY opinion is changing any pay to play to open up even an appearance of a conflict is not the right thing to do. As far as a fake name, I used my real name a few times, and I was punished accordingly by the administration, so lesson learned.

    Friday, March 4, 2016 at 11:32 am | Permalink
  20. Mike-Showing lots of anger…hope you can gather some self-control…here you go again-scolding me…..the remark that you referenced, in my opinion, demonstrates stupidity-want to know what’s classes? You and other opponents of the mayor trying to make this a crime of the century …when the changes in pay-to-play make perfect sense-By the way, the money donated by the Women’s Caucus was immediately returned….again-blowing everything out of proportion with limited information-to put our town leaders in a bad light..challenge me if you choose, but You and fellow opponents have made it your life’s work to besmirch the reputations of very fine, honest, caring individuals-including the mayor….guess you just enjoy being on the bandwagon with your negative-thinking friends-follow the leader type- thing-also, it’s OK with you to have someone use the words perverse and evil ..these words demonstrate the very negative approach you and other opponents take on local matters. A bit one-sided..and narrow in your should evaluate your high and mighty stances-I’m classless? Those who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones-defending a person using the words perverse and evil ? Really?? If that wording is acceptable to you….then this saying certainly applies to you….a bit hypocritical because you’re still “scolding” me…I’m glad to be out of my league if it has anything to do with you or the likes of you-who wants to be in your league? your comments to me are shallow-showing little thought..

    Friday, March 4, 2016 at 1:01 pm | Permalink
  21. Claire Deicke wrote:

    #19-Thanks for your polite approach in explaining your positions..

    Friday, March 4, 2016 at 2:27 pm | Permalink
  22. Mike Seebeck wrote:

    Claire no anger at all. Determination lots of it! Shared with many residents, hundreds of them. We are determined not to let the Mayor and Council pervert our pay to play ordinance and are conducting a legal petition to protect and preserve our rights. Very local effort by many wonderful residents. I can see why the change in the pay to play law makes sense to you. Look at the PAC contributions you are taking in to the Belmar Democratic Committee. Let’s face facts Claire in your eyes those anonymous contributors and their interests are the good and the residents who object to those PAC interests are the evil. I didn’t bring up Jen’s contribution issues the Coast Star reporter did a great job covering that. I did happen to come across a very similar contribution to the Belmar Democratic Committee did you return that contribution? Gene Creamers comment is simple and truthful. I did the best I could to work his words into my comment as they are neither offensive nor negative. And as far as leagues I wasn’t referring to myself I was referring to Gene who is one of the most factual, truthful and thoughtful people I know. Your opinion that my comments are shallow and thoughtless makes perfect sense to me. Hope you have a great time at the parade.

    Friday, March 4, 2016 at 2:47 pm | Permalink
  23. Claire Deicke wrote:

    Good for you, Mike! Other communities function well without stringent pay-to-play regulations. Have no idea what you’re referencing about The Democratic Committee… By the way, I would NEVER,EVER consider myself to be on the same intellectual level as the person you support…he’s way too smart for me, especially the way he spews all those interesting facts at council meetings..classless? Useless? I think those words are negative … Nice try cleaning up your initial remarks… Why do you constantly wish to destroy the reputations of good people ? Say what you want, you are so wrong on all fronts..

    Friday, March 4, 2016 at 6:05 pm | Permalink
  24. Claire Deicke wrote:

    Mike-Never said those who are against changes in pay to play are evil.. You inserted that.. This is what you other’s like you do-twist words and the truth.. And if you don’t think that words like evil and perversion are not negative, then I don’t hold much hope that any further remarks made by you will make much sense.. Given the lack of understanding of your own language ..

    Friday, March 4, 2016 at 6:38 pm | Permalink
  25. The Truth wrote:

    Bla bra bla bla

    Friday, March 4, 2016 at 7:21 pm | Permalink
  26. Anonymous wrote:

    For those who are being harangued about anonymous posting: “the great thing about social media was how it gave a voice to voiceless people. But we’re now creating a surveillance society, where the smartest way to survive (retaliate) is to back to being voiceless.” Jon Robson

    Voice your knowledge because in BELMAR there is TRUTH in anonymity.

    Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 8:11 am | Permalink
  27. Claire Deicke wrote:

    #25-The Truth-Check out your comment… You need serious help… Mistake? Typo? One has to wonder…

    Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 9:47 am | Permalink
  28. SPIN wrote:

    There is no credibility in portraying political DISAGREEMENT with NEGATIVITY. There are members of our community like Claire Deicke who repeatedly attempt to make negativity and disagreement as one and the same. This is spin and not honest discourse.
    I can safely say that it’s UNAMERICAN. To quote Jonah Goldberg ” Our country, if you read the ‘Federalist Papers’ is about disagreement. It’s about pitting faction against faction, divided government, checks and balances. The hero in American political tradition is the man who stands up to the mob-not the mob itself.” It is time to request that certain individuals voicing their opinions in local political discourse refrain from mischaracterizing political disagreement.

    Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 9:48 am | Permalink
  29. Claire Deicke wrote:

    26-Interesting interpretation of quote..making an excuse for cowardice..”Coward is as coward does..”…Forest Gump…Where are you when I need you?? You stopped commenting…

    Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 9:59 am | Permalink
  30. SPIN wrote:

    #29. There you go again ! You are portraying
    SENSIBLE as COWARDICE. Again a no pass. How anyone with an ounce of common sense or intelligence for that matter would criticize
    an articulate and obviously concerned citizen
    for being sensible and then attacking that person by misquoting a stupid Hollywood film.
    If you must quote the film, it is “stupid is as stupid does. As I have always contended, and now you may quote me, ” stupidity can be very dangerous.”

    Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 3:04 pm | Permalink
  31. Claire Deicke wrote:

    30-Cowardice has to do with people who don’t have the courage of their convictions to use their actual names… Like yourself..

    Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 4:04 pm | Permalink
  32. joe goofinoff wrote:

    My advice to all you people trying to engage in a discussion with Mrs Deicke is to cease and desist. You should have all learned by now that all you’re going to get out of her is a bunch of verbal/written head, shoulder and hip fakes adding up to nothing.

    Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 5:04 pm | Permalink
  33. Claire Deicke wrote:

    28 &29 .. My original response to your comments referencing didn’t appear.. So I’m trying again.. You can quote whomever you chose .. You are wrong.. Great approach with capitalizing certain words … Great technique … Bashing the mayor on matters other than local government matters .. That’s the AMERICAN way? Demeaning people because of their perceived intellectual limitations… That’s the AMERICAN way? Presenting innuendo with any proof …,that’s what YOU support? Posting Blah bra blah blahs … That’s the AMERICAN way ? Making fun of borough employees ? That’s the AMERICAN way? Claiming that council members… Past and present only help those who support the mayor ( so untrue ). That ‘s the AMERICAN way?? Using fake titles and not having the courage of your convictions? That’s the AMERICAN way? Constantly seeking information .. Twisting and turning facts to make people look bad.. That’s the AMERICAN way? You are so full of baloney… The best title you can come up with is spin?? And you are so lifeless you didnCget the humor of my FOrest Gump remark.. So here’s the story .. I’ll continue to do what I did both on this blog and in the media to make known my positions..and, as I think of things , will continue to discredit your thinking with personal experiences and examples of comments made on this blog are so limited in your thinking that you couldn’t grasp that my comments about cowardice have to do with you and others like you who hide behind fake names so that you can make nasty comments without consequences ..but make no mistake … I’ll continue to post commentary to answer your inane remarks.. You are pathetic … Will be the subject of my remarks both on this blog and in the media …and I’ll note that you function under an assumed that you will have no credibility in the legitimate media..Dave … Please print this..Im entitled to respond to this in identified person who lacks credibility , honesty , and intelligence ..

    Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 7:20 pm | Permalink
  34. Claire Deicke wrote:

    Joe-or whatever ridiculous name you call your self.. You’re so right … Why should I cease and desist when my name is mentioned ? Small minded people like yourself deserve a head’so up … You mention my name.. I won’t go away ..

    Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 7:24 pm | Permalink
  35. Claire Deicke wrote:

    Part II for about the people who who picked apart all of the good works done during and after Hurricane Sandy ? Was that the AMERICAN way? You can quote all of the Federalists you want.. My thinking is that they would deem YOU as UNAMERICAN.. I plan to go to the newspapers with your remarks using my ACTUAL name ..countering your remarks SPIN..,to see what the general public had to say about your attackvon me ..ascivkist all of my contributions to the community as a Board of Education member , council president , founder of a breast cancer support group , award-winning teacher( named to Who’s Who among America’s Teachers , and recipient of the State Teachers’ Recognition Award..and then we’ll see who is deemed councilwoman chaired the ADA committee (one of your esteemed counterparts discredited the work accomplished by this group ) founded the WEllneaa Campaign here in town.. Brought medical staff in to Belmar during the summer to do free skin cancer screenings ..UNAMERICAN?? You haven’t heard the end of this .. I will cite you as Spin .. How dare you call me UNAMERICAN..

    Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 7:46 pm | Permalink
  36. Claire Deicke wrote:

    Actually ..I erred..Spin is 28 and 30.. What is UNAMERICAN is that you wish to deny my right to respond when my name is mentioned … BILL of RIGHTS … Remember?? UNAMERICAN for me to answer? SPIN … You need to review what you learned in your 8th grade social studies class …

    Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 8:05 pm | Permalink
  37. ALLTRUMPEDUP wrote:

    Hey Ms. C., why don’t you get off this page and go answer Mike’s question regarding the mysterious $610 donation? I’d love to see a full page on that. I may even read the whole thing for a change.

    Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 8:05 pm | Permalink
  38. Claire Deicke wrote:

    For readers… I’m e-mailing from my phone …typos will be noted ..sorry about the errors.. Thanks Dave for posting my comments even with the errors ..getting used to typing with big fingers and small letters ..

    Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 8:16 pm | Permalink
  39. admin wrote:

    Note to commenters:
    I’m going to lay down now so any comments sent in won’t be moderated until I get up to pee in a few hours.

    Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 8:21 pm | Permalink
  40. Claire Deicke wrote:

    37-you tell me about the mysterious donation .. That way you won’t have to suffer through my commentary…you to know something about the “mystery”…want to make it another crime of the century..should I be frightened? I’m shaking in my boots.. Why don’t you tell me why you’re afraid to identify yourself ? Afraid of retaliation? Get some guts, know me .. But I don’t know you.. So you can insult , be rude, and exhibit childish tendencies .. Next thing you know one of your cohorts will report me! I’m scared.. Give me a break !

    Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 12:24 am | Permalink
  41. The Truth wrote:

    Bla Bla Bla , stop with the Sandy stuff already , you would think he was the only Mayor that helped his or her town recover from the storm. I will give you this, unlike other area mayors he did turn into a political issue, maybe due to the fact he has more free time to be Mayor than the others . What do they say about idle hands are the devil’s work place?

    Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 5:24 am | Permalink
  42. joe goofinoff wrote:

    #39 – TMI…

    Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 7:14 am | Permalink
  43. admin wrote:

    I’m sorry. I thought you knew.

    Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 7:35 am | Permalink
  44. Anonymous wrote:

    Mad Matt Photo ops. Not a joke to take advantage in a time of crisis and still trying to ride that wave. It used to be called profiteering during war. Don’t forget that the Camera Techs were making jokes “here he comes again in that scooter of his speeding to our new locations. No matter where we go to get footage, he goes where the camera is over and over again Thank God for editing”.

    Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 9:01 am | Permalink
  45. Disillusioned wrote:

    Claire – I am a long time registered Democrat.. I do vote based on issues – not always with party lines. I am ashamed of the Democrats in this town.. I saw multiple fraudulent sample ballots mailed to one address in Belmar – I know where they came from. I know who they are associated with and who gave them the address and encouraged them to register with it. It was blatant.. it was investigated and they got away with it – I will never believe or support this Mayor.. You know damn well that MOST citizens are for the overturn of Citizens United -for you and the mayor to say you want to become “compliant” with SCOTUS decision is ridiculous. There is no need to comply – we must work to overturn and have our elections be for the people, not only for those who can pay.

    Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 10:07 am | Permalink
  46. Claire Deicke wrote:

    #37..why don’t you tell me about the “mystery donation?” You seem so interested in this … Another crime of the century I in trouble ?? Am I going to get turned over to the authorities ? Why don’t you tell me about the perceived wrong-doing? That way you won’t have to endure reading my commentary.. It seems painful for you it because my words are difficult for you to comprehend? Let’s make this donation a major problem .. Why not ?? On No! I’m so scared.. Also … You’re a weakling .. Using a fake name… And you wish to take me to task.. Oh No ! I’m shaking in my boots.. Why don’t you explain your cowardice … Fake person…give me a break..get some guts..

    Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 12:41 pm | Permalink
  47. Claire Deicke wrote:

    45Whatever you say.

    Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 12:45 pm | Permalink
  48. Claire Deicke wrote:

    41-You missed the point due to poor reading skills-I never stated or inferred that the Mayor alone was responsible for bringing the town back after Sandy.. My point is that opposition members criticized every single action that was taken on behalf of the it your life’s work to undermine and demean efforts by the town’s leadership? Perhaps you should seek a more purposeful reason for your existence..

    Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 12:53 pm | Permalink
  49. Anonymous wrote:

    MATT: Time to take stock and listen to the YOUR neighbors. View YOUR dilution of BELMAR’S resident protective PAY TO PLAY as a lesson learned and be a strong example of hearing and work to keep your residents satisfied with your representation instead of your own selfish goals. Certify the petition and you sign.

    I’d rather value you than be embarrassed by this PAY TO PLAY WHEELING SCHEME

    Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 12:54 pm | Permalink
  50. Disillusioned wrote:

    47 – Great response, Claire.. you can’t say much because you know in your heart it is true.. the Mayor is on the take.. he is using Belmar as his stepping stone.. and you, like many of his groupies, will just go along for the ride.. don’t worry about the taxpayers who will be stuck with this mess.

    Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 3:28 pm | Permalink
  51. Resident wrote:

    Everyone check your water bills very carefully. Also real estate taxes are going south,

    Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 6:02 pm | Permalink
  52. ALLTRUMPEDUP wrote:

    #51- Could you possibly expound on those two points? My water bill has always been an issue and I have heard from a good source that Alfred E. is looking hard to find money this year to balance a flat budget.

    Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 8:17 pm | Permalink
  53. Anonymous wrote:

    #50..No, Disillusioned .. I don’t know it to be true… I don’t believe it for a minute.. What a terrible statement to make about the mayor…I was/am much closer to situations that you allude to.. You know nothing about anything..your statements are off base and hurtful.. I’m 73… Too old to be a groupie…your suggestion that I would go along , and not care about taxpayers is hateful . The mayor’s concern, first and foremost is for the taxpayer. To suggest that I’m part of anything dishonest is libelous …

    Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 8:24 pm | Permalink
  54. Disillusioned wrote:

    Claire -Sorry – but I witnessed it with my own eyes.. several sample ballots for people who NEVER lived at the address in Belmar- many actually reside in other towns, some other states. The home owner testified with the Monmouth County Prosecutor .. they got away with it- from what I understand, with the help of expensive attorney. The voting laws were changed so that messengers could not deliver so many ballots. Don’t call me a liar. The Mayor does not care about tax payers – it is obvious – he only cares about his own political aspirations.

    Monday, March 7, 2016 at 6:58 am | Permalink
  55. Anonymous wrote:

    Disillusioned-You seem convinced of what you state…I’m not and never will be..if you are so positive of your perceptions, and have these deep-seeded convictions why don’t you identify yourself? Afraid of retaliation ? What an old, harried excuse! How truthful can you be.. When you aren’t even true to yourself ..get some nerve..willy-nilly is no way to go through life..

    Monday, March 7, 2016 at 9:46 am | Permalink
  56. Disillusioned wrote:

    because I do believe that there could be retaliation – look at how crooked things are in this town? I am sure you know what and who I am talking about. They got away with it – and still do. When you see a crime and you know it happened and people get away with it, you tend to lose faith in justice. Our plan is to move as soon as we can – we are working towards it. I am as liberal as they come, I voted for our Mayor before I knew what was up. Open your eyes..

    Monday, March 7, 2016 at 10:09 am | Permalink
  57. Anonymous wrote:

    #54 Disillusioned If you see something like you claim you owe it to yourself and the citizens of Belmar to video or snap pictures and send it to the Acting Attorney Generals office. Making claims that might be true is not helpful without proof, and gives the council’s supporters rebuttals to clog up the blog.

    Monday, March 7, 2016 at 10:51 am | Permalink
  58. forrest gump wrote:

    Have been away running across country again. No Gumpisms today, sorry.

    Monday, March 7, 2016 at 11:50 am | Permalink
  59. Claire Deicke wrote:

    1 is me…Claire

    Monday, March 7, 2016 at 12:31 pm | Permalink
  60. Claire Deicke wrote:

    56-I don’t buy that retaliation spin.. People who comment with fake titles / anonymously do so because they get away with making statements that are untrue.. And nasty Like yourself .. I could also say I’m fearful of retaliation due to my answers I give on this blog … It takes guts to admit what you think and believe.. Retaliation against me would come form the opposition .. Maybe it’s good you’re contemplating leaving town .. As a fifty year resident, I think it’s important that Belmar residents should be strong minded, strong willed..and have the courage and pride to stand up for what they believe.. You don’t fill the bill..Good Bye..

    Monday, March 7, 2016 at 6:07 pm | Permalink
  61. admin wrote:

    Monday, March 7, 2016 at 6:19 pm | Permalink
  62. Disillusioned wrote:

    Wow – Claire. My partner has been here over 50 years- YOU are a nasty woman- you will defend blindly what you have no idea about – or pretend to have no idea, which is more like it. Testimony was given – investigators followed the trail to Rincon..they got away with it – so, yes – I fear retribution. Thankfully the people that run this blog continue to fight and WIN in court..

    Monday, March 7, 2016 at 8:00 pm | Permalink
  63. admin wrote:

    Just a clarification, only one person administrates the blog and the administrator has never been party to any legal actions against the Borough. I have collected petition signatures though.

    Monday, March 7, 2016 at 8:09 pm | Permalink
  64. Disillusioned wrote:

    Admin – Good to know 😉 sorry – I get upset when people call me names.. things are so out of hand here – can you blame someone for fearing retaliation?

    Monday, March 7, 2016 at 8:39 pm | Permalink
  65. admin wrote:

    Not at all

    Monday, March 7, 2016 at 8:41 pm | Permalink
  66. Claire Deicke wrote:

    62-Call me nasty if you choose..let’s face it… I hit a chord when I posted that you hide behind a disillusioned title to state ugly things… Should I fear retaliation from those who oppose my politics? I’m honest enough to use my real name..childish to state that you fear retaliation when we all know what the real reason is.. To use your own word… So that you can write”nasty “. Thoughts about me and have no idea about all of the good things happening here in Belmar..since this administration took office..yet you choose to condemn.. I think you are defensive due to qualms of conscience about your statements…hopefully you have worked as hard for community as those who have the best interests of the town at heart.. Self evaluate your attempts to put Belmar in a bad light..never do I ” blindly” accept anything ..your words are loaded with negativity..You started this whole conversation in the first place..guess you thought that I wouldn’t have the guts to wrong you are!

    Tuesday, March 8, 2016 at 10:39 am | Permalink
  67. ms.perspicacity wrote:

    The comments here get a bit “rough” at times, but no one qualifies as “nasty” as thoroughly as she who uses her own name, proudly. Let the one with the sharpest tongue hurl the next comment. That would indeed be a waste of time on this thread.

    Tuesday, March 8, 2016 at 1:13 pm | Permalink
  68. Just Passing Through wrote:

    Well said MS.P!

    Tuesday, March 8, 2016 at 1:36 pm | Permalink
  69. Claire Deicke wrote:

    67-Your remarks are laughable…I respond when I’m mentioned…you excuse those who malign me… And I’m the nasty one .. Actually I love being nasty… I stay up nights so that I can hone my Nasty skills…your commentary is obnoxious…many people who read this blog think so… What a twisted sense of right and wrong … I’m nasty using my name.. And weaklings like your self are perfect people..hysterical! None nastier than me? Check out your self…

    Tuesday, March 8, 2016 at 5:53 pm | Permalink

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.