Skip to content

Council Meeting Of November 5, 2014

14 Comments

  1. Pootsie wrote:

    Since when can we pass an ordinance with two votes?

    Thursday, November 6, 2014 at 7:35 am | Permalink
  2. Shrugged wrote:

    The DJais owners said it was OK, that how.

    Thursday, November 6, 2014 at 8:39 am | Permalink
  3. Guest wrote:

    Glad to see you are still videoing the meetings. Which is in itself an amazing public service. Thank you!

    Thursday, November 6, 2014 at 8:57 am | Permalink
  4. Anonymous wrote:

    Where’s Bean?

    Thursday, November 6, 2014 at 10:07 am | Permalink
  5. admin wrote:

    His son was promoted to Airman First Class in the Junior Civil Air Patrol last night.

    Thursday, November 6, 2014 at 10:16 am | Permalink
  6. George wrote:

    Its a good idea re district representation, however the one sided party will still do what they want!

    Thursday, November 6, 2014 at 10:32 am | Permalink
  7. George wrote:

    I wanted to add the majority of the vote were loyal democrats who don’t care about ethics or spending with common sense, no pun intended.

    Thursday, November 6, 2014 at 10:36 am | Permalink
  8. Belmar Independent wrote:

    It is not “drama” or anything else to expect that the elected officials obey the law. Last night passing an ordinance
    without quorum as stated in our borough law is a no pass. To have a municipal attorney state that it was OK only makes things worse going forward.

    Thursday, November 6, 2014 at 11:19 am | Permalink
  9. Tulip wrote:

    If they go on long enough they will hang themselves. It’s drama people.
    I do not think it will work.

    Thursday, November 6, 2014 at 3:51 pm | Permalink
  10. excuse me wrote:

    I observed that the attorney was laughing at Connie while she was speaking toward the end. Smug son-of-a-gun. Of course Doherty wants the party system in tact – no union money. And if someone in politics does not want his family mentioned? One answer: stay out of politics.

    Thursday, November 6, 2014 at 4:11 pm | Permalink
  11. excuse me wrote:

    amend: no union money IF NOT A DEMOCRAT.

    Thursday, November 6, 2014 at 4:14 pm | Permalink
  12. Eugene Creamer wrote:

    Come January 2015 …. when all the ducks are in a row …. 5 can attend a Council meeting …. 4 can abstain from voting on an ordinance …. and 1 can approve it!

    Friday, November 7, 2014 at 8:14 am | Permalink
  13. Eugene Creamer wrote:

    “Go to the video tape” …. I don’t see a Council quorum when Ordinance 2014 – 18 was being considered …. I don’t hear a quorum call by the clerk, as required by Borough code.

    Friday, November 7, 2014 at 12:46 pm | Permalink
  14. the grench wrote:

    So we are stuck with the ordinance by a technicality? That was just an “oversight”, right?

    Friday, November 7, 2014 at 4:14 pm | Permalink

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.