-
Pages
Recent Comments
-
No recent comment found.
Archives
- January 2022
- December 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
Common Sense For New Hampshire
Liberty Begins At Home
18 Comments
That’s pretty sad on the council’s part. These people ought to be ashamed to be involved in such a charade.
Inasmuch as Mr. McGill works only for the Mayor & Council, he has no need for a microphone because they can hear him without.
Better use of the microphone would be on the other end of the table for use by public commenters with disabilities …. or have paper references that are difficult to juggle while standing.
I heard no mention about the proposed meetings about the sidewalk repairs. Did that fall into the black hole of misleading information?
Matt is hiding and Tom could not decide what to wear from his wardrobe so he stayed home.
Agenda rearranged for Nicolay so she could leave? The meeting should have ended at that time. No quorum. Absentee members, members who can’t wait to leave, committee reports sound like a social club, never a financial report, and I could go on and on. Just pathetic. Get the attorney a microphone so the public can hear him when he’s allowed to speak. Ugh….
Never will be approved to speak for the populous.
This mayor and council continue to take advantage of the citizens trust by neglecting to attend meetings and by also never mentioning the financial position of the borough as routine business.
I did not like the public session moved to the beginning instead of being at the end as was typical. If someone with something critical and important to present came in too late, he/she was out of luck. That looked like a deliberate and sneaky trick to me. And get rid of that lawyer. His advice appears to be too biased for the mayor and council’s shenanigans. In my opinion.
Mess.
Blame all the people who voted for these people. Vote for your party no matter what? NOT
#8 – Was the public session moved up because councilwoman Nicolay was leaving early?
Unless I am mistaken, the individual resolutions were bundled as a consent agenda and passed, which was not how they were presented on the agenda. Also, Nicolay and Blackburn may not have been permitted to vote on the liquor license renewal for the Boathouse, a Harmon establishment. “Retooled”? What does that really mean?
They voted separately to pass the payment of bills; the other two items were grouped and passed together.
Why did they move up the public session? Because they could and no one would object? I suspect they were expecting someone to confront them with something they did not want to address. A pre-emptive strike. My opinion.
Really sad, the picture says it all….MIA council and mayor.
Where and why was not our mayor at this meeting? I know there are challenges surrounding the P2P law. Someone please explain to me the no show. I would think that a political official would want to spearhead the issue to the tax paying residents of Belmar.
matt and the council should be completely ashamed of their performance on behalf of Belmar. However, with their moral and ethical deficiencies, they are okay with it. Shocking! Gutless and crass ambition!
No one addressed the pay to play matter in the public session, at least to use their five minutes to express their displeasure. Yes, it seems pointless to address the people upon the dais, but at least speak for the record.
#17. You were welcome to go to meeting and address the pay to play issue at the public meeting. I mean after all who is “no one, or they? The same people stand at these meetings inviting the wrath of the administration. It’s time for everyone who reads these pages and cares about Belmar to openly get involved. Stand up, speak out, join together and VOTE NO on September 27.
Post a Comment