Skip to content

Expired Abatement Law Still In Our Code

Shouldn’t it be removed?


Screen Shot 2015-03-15 at 7.29.49 AM


Screen Shot 2015-03-15 at 7.30.21 AM

One Comment

  1. Eugene Creamer wrote:

    The Borough Council could have renewed the abatement …. if 20% of the tax base took advantage of the first term …. I doubt the 20% was achieved because the required property owner notice was not included with tax bills …. as required by the statute.
    Admin is correct …. the ordinance should be removed from the Borough Tax Code.
    Otherwise, the status of the “Rehabilitation Area” is unknown to me.

    Sunday, March 15, 2015 at 10:09 am | Permalink

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.