Skip to content

In Today’s Mail

14 Comments

  1. Why a letter? wrote:

    Waste of money.

    Monday, January 9, 2017 at 3:51 pm | Permalink
  2. elemental wrote:

    “Place: Belmar ‘Elementary’ Auditorium”

    Is this the official gathering and meeting place for members of “The Element” to be heard? Hear ye, hear ye…

    Monday, January 9, 2017 at 4:52 pm | Permalink
  3. Tom Dilberger wrote:

    I fear for Matt. As we all know, he’s no saint, but now he’s becoming involved with that nest of hideous vipers (I mean that only in the best way) down at the “school?” I think we should all say a prayer for him.

    Monday, January 9, 2017 at 5:36 pm | Permalink
  4. Eugene Creamer wrote:

    I hope …
    I wish …
    I have …
    I know …
    I look …
    I will …
    I hope …

    IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

    Monday, January 9, 2017 at 9:35 pm | Permalink
  5. Mariaflorio wrote:

    If the mayor didn’t listen to us at the borough meetings what makes you think he will listen to us at his special meeting? Good luck Matt.

    Monday, January 9, 2017 at 10:42 pm | Permalink
  6. Anonymous wrote:

    Again people remember, as a Freeholder candidate this man lost EVERY DISTRICT in his own home town. He sees the writing on the wall. The Board of Ed should not allow this and at the very least, may be required to rent the auditorium out for this type of gathering. It can not just be lent to Matt because he wants to have a meeting.

    Tuesday, January 10, 2017 at 5:32 am | Permalink
  7. OLD MAN wrote:

    I will be there hidden behind a large chair.

    Tuesday, January 10, 2017 at 7:22 am | Permalink
  8. Eugene Creamer wrote:

    sorry …. missed the last:

    “I look …”

    Eight(8) “I” in a short letter sets the record

    Tuesday, January 10, 2017 at 7:37 am | Permalink
  9. Anonymous wrote:

    Could you just stop and read the above political letter (that you just paid for out of your tax bill) and count the number of I’s?

    Tuesday, January 10, 2017 at 8:27 am | Permalink
  10. Mr. Creamer’s post reminded me of a nursing director I worked with. Every positive event, or suggestion (no matter its source) was presented in sentences beginning with “I” … not unlike our Mayor’s letter. Our administrator gave her a nick-name … “me me” … perfect to describe her proclivity for self aggrandizement (most often undeserved). BTW, I did not receive the letter sent from the Mayor, not the first time town-wide communications missed my mailbox.

    Tuesday, January 10, 2017 at 8:42 am | Permalink
  11. legion wrote:

    Ha ha, that’s a lot for one guy in a brief post to the people. Who is “we”? Must be the royal “we”, considering the one who wrote the letter.

    Tuesday, January 10, 2017 at 8:52 am | Permalink
  12. Anonymous wrote:

    Are council members going to be able to answer questions at the Saturday meeting or only “I will take questions” it’s my show Mcdirty? BTW “take questions” doesn’t mean ANSWERS will be forthcoming or even responded in kind.

    Tuesday, January 10, 2017 at 9:21 am | Permalink
  13. Terry wrote:

    I have to admit I was not worthy

    enough to get an invitation to

    the meeting. I will survive!

    Wednesday, January 11, 2017 at 11:23 pm | Permalink
  14. Anonymous wrote:

    Terry And you are a woman. Will we hear you roar?

    Thursday, January 12, 2017 at 8:29 am | Permalink

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.