Skip to content

In Today’s Mail:

Letter from Pringle

Letter from Pringle2


  1. B wrote:

    Hello Claire time to wake up !!!

    Tuesday, September 30, 2014 at 2:55 pm | Permalink
  2. noreen wrote:

    Thank you for giving the public an opportunity to view the unvarnished truth in your “COMMONSENSEFORBELMAR.COM”. Belmar Bravehearts do have a future.

    Tuesday, September 30, 2014 at 3:45 pm | Permalink
  3. guest wrote:

    Great letter by a truely great mayor for 20+ years.

    Tuesday, September 30, 2014 at 3:59 pm | Permalink
  4. Belmar Independent wrote:

    OK folks:
    too much dirty laundry hanging out here.
    Matt apologize to Kathy for leaving the toilet seat up and Maggie apologize to Kenny for screwing up the toothpaste.
    I know a good arbitrator, but not sure all you children will cooperate. For the like of me, I simply cannot imagine how people outside Belmar view all this. Not that any of you four care.

    Tuesday, September 30, 2014 at 4:13 pm | Permalink
  5. Current wrote:

    Totally get it independent. I for one am sick of the “formers”, you know, former mayors, former council presidents and former BOE members and former teachers, former financial advisors in Brielle and former Chief of Staff for the governor, and LIUNA and former, former formers. ENOUGH! Ken Pringle is currently the principal in a law firm that has filed a lawsuit against the mayor, Claire is the current campaign manager for the mayor, the mayor’s SPOUSE is the current CEO of M-Public Affairs.
    If any of you are “currently” registered to vote (pay no attention to the formers behind the curtain. Vote your conscience.

    Tuesday, September 30, 2014 at 5:33 pm | Permalink
  6. Guest wrote:

    Clearly Mayor Party thought that He could get way with this.Doherty has no problem with wasting federal taxpayers money post Sandy.Shameful behavior

    Tuesday, September 30, 2014 at 8:59 pm | Permalink
  7. Katrina wrote:

    I really don’t care how people outsideBelmar view all this. I care how the tax paying residents of Belmar view it. We would all I’m sure just like to move on from all of this. But remember if no one walked around with those petitions in the first place, we could have 4 giant PAVILIONS on our boards at the cost of who knows how much (if 2 one stories were going to cost 7 mill, you do the math) that’s not to mention we, the taxpayers In Belmar, would have no control over what went in those PAVILIONS (redevelopment lawsuit number 1, “frivolous”? I think not) we could have broke current law if the mayor had his way to use only beach utility money to pay for those buildings (“frivolous lawsuit 2, then those outside Belmar could really have cared, suing us at the cost of who knows how much). If our current Mayor would have just listened to our pleas we would not have had to spend 17 grand on a special election (HIS choice not ours, this after giving the wrong statute to the media making it look like we created the problem) thanks goodness the people INSIDE Belmar realized) So as much as it seems uncomfortable, as much as we would all like to live in Nirvana, the fact remains that we citizens have a responsibility to watch our government and try to correct its wrongs, no matter how unpleasant it all seems. Our current petition again signed by hundreds asks for wording to be removed that has the potential to cost more for the taxpayers INSIDE Belmar for every job we need from here on out. My question is why our elected officials are holding on to this like it’s the holy grail (and please don’t say it’s so the work is done by qualified people), that argument went out the window when the mayor tacked on language without proper notice to the residents. Not to mention the ordinance on the books was adequate (after all didn’t Epic do a “great job” on our boardwalk without the language, according to our Mayor and Council?) ALL THE NEW LANGUAGE NEEDS TO BE REMOVED from ordinance 2014-1. NOT just part of it!!!

    Wednesday, October 1, 2014 at 3:51 am | Permalink
  8. Katrina wrote:

    Ps. That from another Belmar Indendent!!

    Wednesday, October 1, 2014 at 4:05 am | Permalink
  9. VITO CORLEONE wrote:

    I get it loud and clear. Vote. Bean/Seebeck

    Wednesday, October 1, 2014 at 8:07 am | Permalink
  10. ms.perspicacity wrote:

    And yes, the mayor used that f word again: “frivolous” – regarding this lawsuit.

    Thursday, October 2, 2014 at 12:31 am | Permalink

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.