Skip to content

More Legal Bills Coming……

Borough Appealing

Gummer Civil Rights Finding




“Explanatory” Statement


Last Year’s Pavilion Bond Referendum Ballot!


Click to open.img_1446.


  1. A Voter 2 wrote:

    Is this appeal done by the Boro’s insurance company, or are they that arrogant?

    Monday, November 7, 2016 at 12:59 pm | Permalink
  2. Joan Corallo wrote:

    Give me a break. How much longer can you beat a dead horse.

    Monday, November 7, 2016 at 1:08 pm | Permalink
  3. Anonymous wrote:

    Refresh my memory. At which meeting of the Mayor and Council was this course of action discussed and voted on ?

    Monday, November 7, 2016 at 1:27 pm | Permalink
  4. admin wrote:

    Well it should have been done in a closed session but there weren’t any.

    Monday, November 7, 2016 at 1:29 pm | Permalink
  5. guest#2 wrote:

    And what good comes out of appealing this? Borough won’t have to pay attorney fees? Is that it?

    Monday, November 7, 2016 at 2:02 pm | Permalink
  6. flower power wrote:

    It does not “look good” to have denied the civil rights of the public. Not very liberal. Keeping up appearances is the name of this game, I would say. Wounded pride of the fearless leader…

    Monday, November 7, 2016 at 3:13 pm | Permalink
  7. OLD MAN wrote:

    O M G Can it get any worse? Vote the Demorats OUT

    Monday, November 7, 2016 at 3:17 pm | Permalink
  8. An Observation wrote:

    Old Man, these are not normal Democrats, they are sick narcissistic individuals.

    Monday, November 7, 2016 at 4:20 pm | Permalink
  9. Guest wrote:

    #4 – Oh I bet there were plenty of closed sessions, just not any that were legal.
    #8 – Yep!

    Monday, November 7, 2016 at 4:31 pm | Permalink
  10. flower power wrote:

    Referring to the description of the Belmar Democrats in charge, I will add that they are power hungry with no conscience, easily bought off for some type of gain or ego boost; superficial individuals who want to be on a bandwagon of similar people who feed off of an us versus them mentality. “We won, you lost” is what nourishes them.

    Monday, November 7, 2016 at 5:15 pm | Permalink
  11. Summer Timer wrote:

    The current mayor and council are passive aggressives and have an agenda that is self-serving…. They are also very smart and I think we under estimate how clever and cunning they are because they continue to win election…. Lets hope that changes tomorrow…. Go Mark & Josh!!!!!!

    Monday, November 7, 2016 at 5:17 pm | Permalink
  12. ALLTRUMPEDUP wrote:

    #8- Oh, and why have we in Belmar been blessed with five ABnormal Democrats?? Give me a break. And yes they are sick and need to be put to some rest, as in voted out of office. VOTE MARK AND JOSH

    Monday, November 7, 2016 at 5:25 pm | Permalink
  13. linlee wrote:

    We need a new ordinance that basically outlines that actions taken by the mayor, council, and administrator…resulting in a legal judgement against them that THEY wish to contest … will be on their own dime.

    Monday, November 7, 2016 at 6:32 pm | Permalink
  14. Anonymous wrote:

    Social engineering.

    Monday, November 7, 2016 at 6:51 pm | Permalink
  15. Just Passing Through wrote:

    #13 There is no NJ law pertaining to Municipal malpractice unfortunately. The make it the voter’s responsibility to vote them out or they deserve what they get.

    Monday, November 7, 2016 at 9:17 pm | Permalink
  16. Anonymous wrote:

    Now we know what the 50G’$ was for, a ha!

    Tuesday, November 8, 2016 at 9:25 am | Permalink
  17. Teddy Ehmann wrote:

    Because of Belmar, I have had the pleasure ( I mean this ) of being in Judge Gummer’s courtroom. Rarely have I witnessed such an informed and detail -oriented judge. The idea of challenging her is therefore for show and appearance. Judge Gummer is so thorough that I doubt she will never have a decision of hers reversed. WHAT TOTAL NONSENSE. This is true whether I agreed or not with her decision.

    Tuesday, November 8, 2016 at 2:06 pm | Permalink

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.