Skip to content

Pay To Play, v.4

Honey, I shrunk the ordinance.

Like in my post of January 28, this is the original ordinance that is currently in the books.  The language in it that is not part of the new ordinance is highlighted.  (There is nothing added to the new ordinance that wasn’t in the old ordinance.)

Click on each page to see it bigger.

coi1coi2coi3coi4-2coi5*In a-2 above, “zero ($0)” now reads “three hundred ($300)”.coi6coi7

Something else I noticed is that the original ordinance has 10 sections but due to the shrinkage it’s proposed replacement only has 7.  The problem is that in the new ordinance references to other sections of the ordinance haven’t had their numbers adjusted.  For example, the language in section 9-4 of the new ordinance used to be part of section 9-6.  There are references in it to section 9-4 but it now is section 9-4 and the old 9-4 that was originally being referred to doesn’t even exist anymore.

Click on the image to download the new ordinance.Screen Shot 2016-02-07 at 5.23.33 AM

I presume that making those corrections won’t be considered to be a significant enough change to warrant a reintroduction.


  1. Anonymous wrote:

    The whole thing is a joke. Matt Doherty is doing this for one reason- to get all that union and pass through money he so desperately craves and needs.

    Sunday, February 7, 2016 at 2:23 pm | Permalink
  2. An Observation wrote:

    The Only reason the Mayor is proposing this is he is running for freeholder. The state and county have very specific rules,check out the board of trustees of Brookdale College for example,also a Notary Public Cannot sign off on any document that a friend or relative receives or will receive a benefit. He is a fake phony and fraud.This is a very watered down version.

    Monday, February 8, 2016 at 10:15 am | Permalink
  3. Better for Belmar wrote:

    Matt is as sleazy as it gets, even for New Jersey

    Tuesday, February 9, 2016 at 9:02 am | Permalink

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.