Skip to content

What I Found Interesting

Nothing interesting (to me) about Belmar in this morning’s news but I did look at these stories:

Aye slow down for whales:

 

 

More scandal in Bayonne (yawn):

 

 

Red light camera scammers are back, O’Scanlon again leads charge against them:

 

9 Comments

  1. GUEST wrote:

    The beach was littered with trash this morning and not a trashcan in site on the beach. When there are two 90+ degree days it would make sense for DPW to put a few trashcans on the beach. A good manual beach sweep was needed but instead DPW was trying to get it all picked up with the John Deere. All that was doing was mashing the trash further into the sand.

    Friday, May 19, 2017 at 8:28 am | Permalink
  2. OLD MAN wrote:

    If they get enough trash (piled) then dunes will not be necessary.

    Friday, May 19, 2017 at 11:53 am | Permalink
  3. Anonymous wrote:

    That’s it: Fresh Kills Landfill Dunes Belmar style.

    Friday, May 19, 2017 at 4:29 pm | Permalink
  4. Big ones wrote:

    Well the Dpw was busy all week installing the drain in the parking lot in the marina, guess for who.

    Friday, May 19, 2017 at 4:53 pm | Permalink
  5. Anonymous wrote:

    Is there any truth that the public safety pavilion will not be ready in time for summer and that the lifeguards will work out of a trailer and shed again? I’m hearing that the contractor is out of money. If this is true, this is an embarrassment of epic proportions. Priorities…

    Friday, May 19, 2017 at 5:19 pm | Permalink
  6. Belmarista wrote:

    Yeah, weird that the safety building seems stalled. If it was a bar would have been done much sooner.
    Is it an Epic disaster?

    Friday, May 19, 2017 at 7:46 pm | Permalink
  7. Tom Dilberger wrote:

    “Safety Building” Nah, better wording is [Clubhouse].

    Friday, May 19, 2017 at 8:13 pm | Permalink
  8. Anonymous wrote:

    Seeing is believing. Maybe a cracked media specialist will find out the scoop behind the supposed Safety building priority schedule in Belmar. $tatting to sound like another Lake Como watershed disaster?

    Saturday, May 20, 2017 at 10:03 am | Permalink
  9. Tulip wrote:

    #4 certainly not for Rhode Island Point. Why should they be dry? Look
    at all the years they have been wet
    did anyone move this fast fo them.Hah!

    Saturday, May 20, 2017 at 4:54 pm | Permalink

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.