Common Sense For New Hampshire

15 Comments

1. Anonymous wrote:

   Mess

   Monday, February 1, 2016 at 10:19 pm | Permalink
2. Eugene Creamer wrote:

   I don’t understand …. is this a picture of a funeral for Waves-on-Main or Tulipano’s? …. Connie’s place has been shuttered awhile ….

   Monday, February 1, 2016 at 10:24 pm | Permalink
3. Concerned wrote:

   Dave . Is there a way to really find out how this project has started without proper permitting? Sounds like we are opening the door to major issues

   Tuesday, February 2, 2016 at 8:09 am | Permalink
4. admin wrote:

   I guess the mayor knows something we don’t. Will keep digging.

   Tuesday, February 2, 2016 at 8:24 am | Permalink
5. Angry Voter wrote:

   It is funeral like and that is appropriate.
   This illegal plan, lease and construction put another nail in the coffin containing hard-working New Jerseyians Who use the Green Acres coastal parkland. The mayor’s statement about attracting rich folks with yachts to spend in Belmar says it all. His idea, not ours (people in Belmar and 100 miles around Belmar.) When did we get to say or comment on this idea? What study was ever done to prove this theory as realistic? WHAT THE MAYOR NEVER TELLS US ARE THE TRUE COSTS. This illegal, unpermitted construction in the mayor’s own words favors the 2% at the cost, the loss of the 98% whose total access to the parkland is legally protected for perpetuity.

   Tuesday, February 2, 2016 at 8:46 am | Permalink
6. Concerned wrote:

   Good picture since it’s really Chefs International that runs the town these days

   Tuesday, February 2, 2016 at 9:58 am | Permalink
7. elemental wrote:

   Belmar needs a roadhouse, not classy looking joints. Wine list? Nah! Lots of beer and burgers. A dredged river might mean no fish kill to stink up the outdoor dining?

   Tuesday, February 2, 2016 at 9:59 am | Permalink
8. Resident wrote:

   It has permitting.

   Tuesday, February 2, 2016 at 10:28 am | Permalink
9. Heard Enough wrote:

   And unless Tom Brennan went to the ground breaking on his 25 minute lunch period, or took half a personal day to attend it, we taxpayers are paying his over $70,000 salary for him to attend this instead of teaching the kids.

   Tuesday, February 2, 2016 at 10:54 am | Permalink
10. the voice wrote:

    Everything is OK.
    Yes, but…
    Trust me, this is covered.

    Tuesday, February 2, 2016 at 11:07 am | Permalink
11. Planet Belmar wrote:

    #9. I am perfectly fine with our “environmental” councilman standing up against free open space and defending the right to exploit the natural treasure/Shark River. We should erect a statue for the marina of him. How do you write corporate greed is good in Latin?

    Tuesday, February 2, 2016 at 4:17 pm | Permalink
12. legion wrote:

    A restaurant at the marina with no parking is expected to be successful while three former restaurant sites on Main Street are vacant. (Main Street business is thriving, yes sir.) A multi-level parking garage must be the next step…where? More construction, union jobs, what else?

    Saturday, February 6, 2016 at 8:53 pm | Permalink
13. Anonymous wrote:

    Didn’t the borough require the Kapalko/Harmon brothers to have parking for their marina property in Phase 1 redevelopment? Has the 2 million dollars lawsuit the Harmons were forced to file against the borough of Belmar settled or is it still ongoing?

    Sunday, February 7, 2016 at 4:07 am | Permalink
14. admin wrote:

    The holdup of the construction has been resolved but there is still a lawsuit pending over the transfer of the liquor license.

    Sunday, February 7, 2016 at 6:43 am | Permalink
15. Anonymous wrote:

    Harmons brothers with established businesses holding 2 valid liqour licenses. Why was their liquor license transfer to a new location across the street to the marina held up for over a year when chefs took only one week to get license approval at the old connellys?

    Sunday, February 7, 2016 at 11:34 am | Permalink

Post a Comment