Skip to content

APP Reports!

Click on the image.Screen Shot 2015-10-06 at 4.28.45 AM


  1. Tom Burke wrote:

    Thank you for providing this article. I could not remember how the bond question was worded since I had already returned my ballot to the Board of elections. Now I know why I did not feel confused over the wording….it is not confusing. I also fail to see how it abridged my civil rights. To me this is just another good example of obstructionist tactics. I find most Belmar residents to be quit intelligent, you know, capable of making an informed decision all on their own.

    Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 6:15 am | Permalink
  2. Anonymous wrote:

    I too find most residents “quit” intelligent. However, Tom Burke isn’t one of them.

    Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 6:51 am | Permalink
  3. admin wrote:

    Usually I fix typos in people’s comments. I missed that one. Sorry.

    Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 6:59 am | Permalink
  4. OLD MAN wrote:

    #1 The point is a judge found it confusing according to law. You will vote yes….no matter what. Why not “quit” now?

    Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 7:49 am | Permalink
  5. Teddy Ehmann wrote:

    #1. Burke continues to ignore the obvious that the judge ruled due to the FACT that appointed officials did this without proper involvement of the elected council. Thus he is signaling how he would behave as an elected official in short,”what difference does it make ?”

    Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 7:56 am | Permalink
  6. Taxpauet wrote:

    The judge struck the entire statement.

    Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 7:57 am | Permalink
  7. Anonymous wrote:

    Coded signal to voters: Quit being informed, don’t use your intellectual abilities. Be one of the SHEEPEOPLE.

    Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 8:13 am | Permalink
  8. Eugene Creamer wrote:

    The civil rights of all Belmartians was violated …. even those who drink the kool-aid.

    Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 8:19 am | Permalink
  9. Bill Straus wrote:

    Burke’s comment shows how as a council member he would ignore the LAW and just do what he likes, he fits in perfect with the mayor.

    Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 11:11 am | Permalink
  10. elemental wrote:

    “Ultra vires” is modus operandi for these people. Now, how to get the sleeping voters to wake up? Perhaps a theoretical example of losing one’s civil rights that resonates for everyone? Once it starts, when does it end?

    Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 12:09 pm | Permalink
  11. Katrina wrote:

    So if Belmar residents can make informed decisions why did our Mayor feel the need to “explain” the wording on the ballot? Without due process to the public. The ruling was to throw out the entire explanation and if I’m reading the decision right the civil rights aspect hasn’t been decided yet

    Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 4:14 pm | Permalink
  12. VITO CORLEONE wrote:

    #11….Explanations must issued?

    Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 4:32 pm | Permalink
  13. Tulip wrote:

    Mail In Ballots in the works should be available next week according to Freehold.

    Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 5:35 pm | Permalink
  14. Concerned wrote:

    Michael DuPont resigns as borough attorney.

    Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 6:22 pm | Permalink
  15. belmarguy wrote:

    #14 – Don’t we wish…

    Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 6:34 pm | Permalink
  16. belmarguy wrote:

    #14 – OMG, you’re not kidding!

    Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 6:37 pm | Permalink

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.