-
Pages
Recent Comments
- Speaking Of Dual Purpose Rides... (4)
- Perfect { It's big enough to be comfortable for the 2 of you but not so huge that you have to plan, in advance, where you are ... }
- admin { For the 1st time I'm glad I'm short }
- eugene creamer { that Mercedes van is tall enough to stand-up in! }
- Just Do It { I think the van is a great idea. You would save money and never have to worry about a hotel room. }
- Live Free And Fly (1)
- Persistent Problem (22)
- { AMEN Vickie }
- Vickie Renner { Here’s a thought. Write the Inn up for its constant violations until it is closed down. Be pro active rather than reactive. Neighbors have complained ... }
- { Classic pot calling the kettle storyline of the "better the enemy you know argument. Thus perpetuation of a drug riddled flop house within 1 block ... }
- Chrysler Faces Largest Recall In History (2)
- Tom Dilberger { The Cherokee nation expelled black people from the tribe. }
- Reuters Completely Incurious (6)
- { Fr. Flanagan's Boys town and a girls town type program could save so many of these orphan like children if there was a plan in ... }
- callmecynical { Bumbling Biden is destroying the country in his sleep while his leftist handlers are tightening his marionette strings. Sad thing is that Biden probably has ... }
- { #3- I couldn't agree with you more. Where's Sleepy Joe been hiding. }
- callmecynical { And likewise, it's Trump's fault that the Democrats had to cheat to win the election because that was the only way they could win. So ... }
- { It's all Trump's fault. If he didn't make it difficult for these people to illegally sneak into a country by these extreme means, this wouldn't ... }
- Belmar Forming Emergency Medical Services Division (2)
- Speaking Of Dual Purpose Rides... (4)
Archives
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
9 Comments
Follow the money …. the only beneficiary of the proposed ordinance would be the Laundromat Owner.
One would assume that a responsible borough council would vet any changes to existing ordinances during a workshop portion of a meeting and then introduce any changes as a result of councilperson consensus from that workshop. What goes on here? The mayor or business administrator make ordinance changes on their own and then actually have ordinance revisions drafted just to reword or pull them before a meeting of introduction because the public got advance notice and disapproved of the changes? This is all just plain backwards and speaks of a muted borough council.
I guess 95.9 The Rat approved of ban?
They had nothing on their site about it.
Question: Who was it ? First it was the police department and now code enforcement who proposed this.
Answer: It was the mayor.
Blame it on the police. Nice.
I think the towels belong more so on some of the people not the railings.
Shouldn’t it be public knowledge who proposed an ordinance?
It should be discussed at the council meeting.
Hey, that’s not fair. If something is a good idea, the mayor gladly gets and takes credit; something stinky, like musty towels and such, he “has nothing to do with it”. Some things should be kept private, like the names of recipients of charity, like gift cards, but an unpopular idea as well??? C’mon, fess up. This is a small town full of love and honesty, right? Welcome to the Matt and Council show, a comedy of errors and shenanigans. Stay tuned, it will just get better. Now I remove my tongue from my cheek.
Post a Comment