Skip to content

Belmar Results For All Races

Grosshandler worst……and first?


Screen Shot 2015-11-05 at 10.03.25 AMScreen Shot 2015-11-05 at 10.02.51 AM

Yes, Janet Grosshandler’s numbers are somewhat interesting.  At the polls she came in last by a wide margin, trailing third place finisher Richard Brand by 114 votes and leader Joanne Gray by 209 votes.  The mail in was a completely different story though.  In that count Grosshandler came in first by a very wide margin, 42 votes ahead of second place Gray.  Thankfully it wasn’t enough.


  1. Tom Fahy wrote:

    Article in the APP said that the provisional ballots for the bonding question wont be counted until Monday. Is there a chance that the 17 vote lead could evaporate? Also, wouldn’t a less than 1% vote differential trigger an automatic recount?

    Friday, November 6, 2015 at 7:55 am | Permalink
  2. A Voter 2 wrote:

    In my opinion not exactly a mandate for the Democrats. Using the % rule usually 20% are the real die hard loyalists, the 80% are the helpless thinkers i always vote democratic no matter what. So i would not exactly call the results a lovefest for Matt.

    Friday, November 6, 2015 at 8:07 am | Permalink
  3. Anonymous wrote:

    Sleazy doesn’t care how you win. Good tracking on the gross VBM. Next glitzy fits for Brian’s seat, Not. talk about imploding.

    Friday, November 6, 2015 at 8:29 am | Permalink
  4. admin wrote:

    Hi Tom. Let’s hope the answer to both of your questions is yes.

    Friday, November 6, 2015 at 8:30 am | Permalink
  5. DJais Drunkard wrote:

    UR-MOM only got 1 vote. What’s wrong with people – who makes waffles after your hangover screw asprin. l o l o l ol – GO MOMMA

    Friday, November 6, 2015 at 11:02 am | Permalink
  6. belmarguy wrote:

    #1 makes a great point. If the difference is only 1%, it should really trigger a re-vote by law. Something is smelling very fishy here. I’m calling the belmar dems out on mail fraud.

    Friday, November 6, 2015 at 11:52 am | Permalink
  7. Tired Resident wrote:

    I am not so tired that I will not consider suing the mayor for lying about the funding. The $5.4 million will never be used in its entirely to pay for the 5th Ave pavilion. He lied in his mailings in the face of the Judge’s decision.

    Friday, November 6, 2015 at 1:29 pm | Permalink
  8. admin wrote:

    Great idea.

    Friday, November 6, 2015 at 1:31 pm | Permalink
  9. OLD MAN wrote:

    I want the yes voters to pay for my aspirins.

    Friday, November 6, 2015 at 2:58 pm | Permalink
  10. admin wrote:

    They should pay for the building.

    Friday, November 6, 2015 at 3:01 pm | Permalink
  11. OLD MAN wrote:

    #10 Yes that also

    Friday, November 6, 2015 at 3:37 pm | Permalink
  12. DJais Drunkard wrote:

    The people who voted NOOOO should pay my tab at D’Jais

    Friday, November 6, 2015 at 4:04 pm | Permalink
  13. Anonymous wrote:

    Senior freezing don’t care what glitzy fits says. criteria, criteria, criteria.

    Friday, November 6, 2015 at 5:23 pm | Permalink
  14. Eugene Creamer wrote:

    APP 11.06.2015

    “Belmar sold $3.8 million in beach badges in 2015 without its signature pavilions. That was nearly $700,000 more in sales than in 2012, the last summer the borough had the pavilions before Sandy washed them away.”

    The Belmar North End Beach is the best ever …. thanks to Sandy …. don’t go backward with tall buildings that spoil precious sand beach area …. let the public enjoy.

    Friday, November 6, 2015 at 10:06 pm | Permalink
  15. OLD MAN wrote:

    #12 How much is your credit line there?

    Saturday, November 7, 2015 at 8:02 am | Permalink
  16. A Voter 2 wrote:

    #14 Its not about the pavilion its about sneaking in another Liquor License for his pal the good Dr.

    Saturday, November 7, 2015 at 8:36 am | Permalink
  17. Guest wrote:

    Can someone expand on this “#14 Its not about the pavilion its about sneaking in another Liquor License for his pal the good Dr.”

    Saturday, November 7, 2015 at 9:50 am | Permalink
  18. Anonymous wrote:

    Good Dr pal… that was in the headlines all year… is it a similar situation? wasn’t th er e something last week about donor contributions from employees being returned, medical???

    Saturday, November 7, 2015 at 10:26 am | Permalink
  19. Guest wrote:

    Can someone please explain who the good Dr is. What is this about returned contributions

    Sunday, November 8, 2015 at 2:12 pm | Permalink
  20. Tulip wrote:

    Is someone supposed to enforce the Judges decisions? If not why all the money for law suits? Why are appeals allowed when the verdict is not enforced? Not only does something stink in this town it smells rotten.

    Monday, November 9, 2015 at 9:08 am | Permalink
  21. Anonymous wrote:

    Prosecutor’s office noticed

    Tuesday, November 10, 2015 at 9:22 am | Permalink
  22. An Observation wrote:

    Unfortunately being unethical is not a crime in Municipal government unless $$ in exchange for something. They are being monitored, they are so cocky they will make a mistake.

    Tuesday, November 10, 2015 at 9:37 am | Permalink
  23. Love the Beach wrote:

    Not following a court order is criminal, not unethical. No? If true that the Prosecutor has noticed Belmar, there must be suspicion of criminal activity.

    Tuesday, November 10, 2015 at 11:01 am | Permalink
  24. callmecynical wrote:

    Right now the only thing that the mayor might be doing that is clearly unethical regarding the recent court matter could be maintaining and still telling people that the 5th Avenue Pavilion will be “free”, of no tax consequence to the taxpayers; and if not that, then convincing residents that a couple of million dollars of potential tax liability is the next best thing because the “it’s free” baloney did not work. The judge ruled on the percentages of payment allocation. Nothing appears to have happened yet, except whatever the spinmaster is concocting. His twisted ways might be considered to be “criminal” in a “higher” court, but we dwell on the lower plane of earth with the laws made by humans. The element of nobodies can only be vigilant in keeping watch and being ready to direct challenges as appropriate.

    Granted, the vote by mail fiasco stinks to “high heaven”. On a larger scale, perhaps getting rid of the corrupted individuals will get rid of the problem. Find a way to do that and that person can be the emperor of the world. Who wants to be the Dictator of Belmar? One guy does.

    Tuesday, November 10, 2015 at 11:50 am | Permalink

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.